Daniel Caldeira, Daniel Inácio Cazeiro, Rui Plácido, Filipa Ferreira, Rita Calé, Fausto J Pinto
{"title":"The Placebo Effect in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Daniel Caldeira, Daniel Inácio Cazeiro, Rui Plácido, Filipa Ferreira, Rita Calé, Fausto J Pinto","doi":"10.3390/medsci13020057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Placebo-controlled studies are crucial in clinical trials, but the placebo effect can vary across conditions. We aimed to assess the placebo effect in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) trials. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and included randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating CTEPH interventions. Primary outcomes were the pre-post changes in the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and quality of life in the placebo arms. Secondary outcomes included mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), cardiac index, and NT-proBNP levels. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. <b>Results:</b> Seven trials with 270 CTEPH patients in placebo arms were analyzed. The average 6MWT change was not significant (-1.31 m; 95%CI -12.49 to +9.79). Quality of life with EQ-5D was not significantly improved (-0.04; 95%CI -0.10 to +0.02). mPAP, PVR, cardiac index, and NT-proBNP also demonstrated non-significant changes with small magnitudes. <b>Conclusions:</b> The placebo effect in CTEPH trials was not statistically significant and had small magnitude but should not discourage the use of placebo-controlled trials where applicable and ethical.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Placebo-controlled studies are crucial in clinical trials, but the placebo effect can vary across conditions. We aimed to assess the placebo effect in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and included randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating CTEPH interventions. Primary outcomes were the pre-post changes in the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and quality of life in the placebo arms. Secondary outcomes included mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), cardiac index, and NT-proBNP levels. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Results: Seven trials with 270 CTEPH patients in placebo arms were analyzed. The average 6MWT change was not significant (-1.31 m; 95%CI -12.49 to +9.79). Quality of life with EQ-5D was not significantly improved (-0.04; 95%CI -0.10 to +0.02). mPAP, PVR, cardiac index, and NT-proBNP also demonstrated non-significant changes with small magnitudes. Conclusions: The placebo effect in CTEPH trials was not statistically significant and had small magnitude but should not discourage the use of placebo-controlled trials where applicable and ethical.