Validity and Reliability of 2D Video Analysis for Swimming Kick Start Kinematics.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ivan Matúš, Bibana Vadašová, Tomáš Eliáš, Łukasz Rydzik, Tadeusz Ambroży, Wojciech Czarny
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of 2D Video Analysis for Swimming Kick Start Kinematics.","authors":"Ivan Matúš, Bibana Vadašová, Tomáš Eliáš, Łukasz Rydzik, Tadeusz Ambroży, Wojciech Czarny","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective evaluation of the swimming start is crucial for sprint performance improvement. Traditional visual assessment of its phases-reaction, take-off, flight, and underwater glide-lacks precision. This study addresses the need for more integrated and accessible biomechanical tools by validating IQ LAB software (Version 250319), which is embedded in the SwimPro system and enables immediate video-based motion analysis without external processing. Existing tools like Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0) require separate video handling and licensing, whereas IQ LAB offers a built-in, streamlined solution suitable for applied environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the concurrent validity of the IQ LAB software, a desktop 2D motion analysis tool, using Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0) as the gold standard. The reliability was assessed using intrarater temporal stability and interrater agreement, considering selected kinematic parameters related to the swimming kick start (to 5 m). A sample of 13 competitive male swimmers (age 17.2 ± 1.1 years) was analyzed across two sessions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing IQ LAB outputs to those from Dartfish software in the sagittal plane. Intrarater reliability was measured using a test-retest design across two sessions spaced 7 days apart. Interrater reliability involved two independent raters analyzing the same video data using IQ LAB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IQ LAB and Dartfish kinematic parameters demonstrated strong agreement (Pearson r ≥ 0.95), with no significant systematic differences. The intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC ≥ 0.94, 95% CI included). The test-retest reliability of the selected parameters across seasons also showed excellent reproducibility (ICC ≥ 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IQ LAB software provides a valid and reliable 2D kinematic assessment of the swimming kick start, offering a practical and accessible tool for coaches and researchers. This study introduces a novel validated software solution for biomechanical analysis in swimming starts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Objective evaluation of the swimming start is crucial for sprint performance improvement. Traditional visual assessment of its phases-reaction, take-off, flight, and underwater glide-lacks precision. This study addresses the need for more integrated and accessible biomechanical tools by validating IQ LAB software (Version 250319), which is embedded in the SwimPro system and enables immediate video-based motion analysis without external processing. Existing tools like Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0) require separate video handling and licensing, whereas IQ LAB offers a built-in, streamlined solution suitable for applied environments.

Methods: We evaluated the concurrent validity of the IQ LAB software, a desktop 2D motion analysis tool, using Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0) as the gold standard. The reliability was assessed using intrarater temporal stability and interrater agreement, considering selected kinematic parameters related to the swimming kick start (to 5 m). A sample of 13 competitive male swimmers (age 17.2 ± 1.1 years) was analyzed across two sessions. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing IQ LAB outputs to those from Dartfish software in the sagittal plane. Intrarater reliability was measured using a test-retest design across two sessions spaced 7 days apart. Interrater reliability involved two independent raters analyzing the same video data using IQ LAB.

Results: IQ LAB and Dartfish kinematic parameters demonstrated strong agreement (Pearson r ≥ 0.95), with no significant systematic differences. The intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC ≥ 0.94, 95% CI included). The test-retest reliability of the selected parameters across seasons also showed excellent reproducibility (ICC ≥ 0.93).

Conclusions: IQ LAB software provides a valid and reliable 2D kinematic assessment of the swimming kick start, offering a practical and accessible tool for coaches and researchers. This study introduces a novel validated software solution for biomechanical analysis in swimming starts.

游泳起跳运动学二维视频分析的有效性和可靠性。
背景:游泳起跑的客观评价是提高短跑成绩的关键。传统的视觉评估阶段——反应、起飞、飞行和水下滑翔——缺乏精度。本研究通过验证IQ LAB软件(版本250319),解决了对更加集成和易于使用的生物力学工具的需求,该软件嵌入在SwimPro系统中,无需外部处理即可实现基于视频的即时运动分析。现有的工具,如Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0)需要单独的视频处理和许可,而IQ LAB提供了一个内置的、简化的解决方案,适用于应用环境。方法:以Dartfish (ProSuite 4.0)软件为金标准,对桌面2D运动分析工具IQ LAB软件的并发效度进行评估。考虑到与游泳踢腿启动(至5米)相关的选定运动学参数,通过水内时间稳定性和水间一致性来评估可靠性。对13名竞技男子游泳运动员(年龄17.2±1.1岁)进行了两期的分析。通过比较IQ LAB和达特菲思软件在矢状面上的结果来评估并发效度。内部信度采用间隔7天的两次重测设计来测量。评价者之间的可靠性涉及两个独立的评价者使用IQ LAB分析相同的视频数据。结果:IQ LAB和Dartfish运动学参数表现出很强的一致性(Pearson r≥0.95),没有显著的系统差异。测试者内部和测试者之间的信度非常好(ICC≥0.94,95% CI包括在内)。各季节所选参数的重测信度也具有良好的重现性(ICC≥0.93)。结论:IQ LAB软件提供了一个有效和可靠的游泳踢腿启动的二维运动学评估,为教练和研究人员提供了一个实用和易于使用的工具。本研究介绍了一种新颖的验证软件解决方案,用于游泳起跑时的生物力学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信