Beyond the Package Insert: A Postmarket Digital Ethnographic Study of FDA-Cleared Prescription Digital Therapeutics.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.84450
Shaheen E Lakhan
{"title":"Beyond the Package Insert: A Postmarket Digital Ethnographic Study of FDA-Cleared Prescription Digital Therapeutics.","authors":"Shaheen E Lakhan","doi":"10.7759/cureus.84450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are FDA-cleared software interventions designed to treat a variety of clinical conditions. Despite clinical validation through randomized controlled trials, PDTs face postmarket challenges that remain unmonitored through traditional surveillance. This study introduces a novel framework of digital ethnography, utilizing social media, specifically Reddit, to capture spontaneous, community-driven insights on PDT experiences beyond clinical trials. It seeks to explore the nuanced realities of user engagement, interface friction, emotional impact, and public perception. Methods We conducted a digital ethnographic analysis of Reddit posts collected from condition-specific and general health subreddits. We focused on 13 FDA-cleared PDTs. Posts containing first-person accounts or caregiver perspectives were included, and a thematic analysis was performed to identify recurrent themes related to user experience. Descriptive statistics were generated to support qualitative findings. Results The study revealed that Reddit communities offer rich, culturally-specific contexts that shape PDT experiences. A final sample of 65 posts, each containing first-person or caregiver perspectives, was analyzed, discussing 11 of the 13 PDTs. Five major domains emerging included ambivalence about efficacy (belief and skepticism), common patterns of engagement and dropout (motivation and frustration), usability challenges (technical friction), and structural barriers to access (insurance and affordability). Additionally, users frequently expressed emotional meaning-making as they navigated their therapeutic journeys. Differences in discussion tone were noted across subreddits: for example, r/ADHD focused on pragmatic usability, while r/depression engaged in deeper emotional reflection. Discussion This digital ethnographic study highlights the importance of integrating user-generated data from digital platforms like Reddit to understand the real-world impact of PDTs. While clinical trials offer limited insights, social media provides a broader, more diverse range of experiences that reveal common usability barriers, engagement patterns, and access challenges. Our findings suggest that the context in which PDTs are discussed, shaped by community norms, beliefs, and expectations, plays a critical role in shaping user outcomes and perceptions. Conclusion Postmarket digital ethnography offers valuable insights into the user experience of FDA-cleared PDTs, which are not captured in traditional clinical trials or regulatory processes. This study advocates for the inclusion of structured social media analysis as part of postmarket surveillance to improve the design, accessibility, and effectiveness of PDTs. Listening to the voice of the patient in informal spaces like Reddit is essential for ensuring the real-world success of digital therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 5","pages":"e84450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are FDA-cleared software interventions designed to treat a variety of clinical conditions. Despite clinical validation through randomized controlled trials, PDTs face postmarket challenges that remain unmonitored through traditional surveillance. This study introduces a novel framework of digital ethnography, utilizing social media, specifically Reddit, to capture spontaneous, community-driven insights on PDT experiences beyond clinical trials. It seeks to explore the nuanced realities of user engagement, interface friction, emotional impact, and public perception. Methods We conducted a digital ethnographic analysis of Reddit posts collected from condition-specific and general health subreddits. We focused on 13 FDA-cleared PDTs. Posts containing first-person accounts or caregiver perspectives were included, and a thematic analysis was performed to identify recurrent themes related to user experience. Descriptive statistics were generated to support qualitative findings. Results The study revealed that Reddit communities offer rich, culturally-specific contexts that shape PDT experiences. A final sample of 65 posts, each containing first-person or caregiver perspectives, was analyzed, discussing 11 of the 13 PDTs. Five major domains emerging included ambivalence about efficacy (belief and skepticism), common patterns of engagement and dropout (motivation and frustration), usability challenges (technical friction), and structural barriers to access (insurance and affordability). Additionally, users frequently expressed emotional meaning-making as they navigated their therapeutic journeys. Differences in discussion tone were noted across subreddits: for example, r/ADHD focused on pragmatic usability, while r/depression engaged in deeper emotional reflection. Discussion This digital ethnographic study highlights the importance of integrating user-generated data from digital platforms like Reddit to understand the real-world impact of PDTs. While clinical trials offer limited insights, social media provides a broader, more diverse range of experiences that reveal common usability barriers, engagement patterns, and access challenges. Our findings suggest that the context in which PDTs are discussed, shaped by community norms, beliefs, and expectations, plays a critical role in shaping user outcomes and perceptions. Conclusion Postmarket digital ethnography offers valuable insights into the user experience of FDA-cleared PDTs, which are not captured in traditional clinical trials or regulatory processes. This study advocates for the inclusion of structured social media analysis as part of postmarket surveillance to improve the design, accessibility, and effectiveness of PDTs. Listening to the voice of the patient in informal spaces like Reddit is essential for ensuring the real-world success of digital therapeutics.

超越包装说明书:fda批准的处方数字疗法的上市后数字人种学研究。
处方数字疗法(PDTs)是fda批准的软件干预措施,旨在治疗各种临床疾病。尽管通过随机对照试验进行了临床验证,但pdt仍然面临着传统监测无法监测的上市后挑战。本研究引入了一个新的数字人种学框架,利用社交媒体,特别是Reddit,捕捉自发的、社区驱动的PDT经验,超越临床试验。它试图探索用户粘性、界面摩擦、情感影响和公众认知的微妙现实。方法:我们对从特定疾病和一般健康版块收集的Reddit帖子进行了数字人种学分析。我们专注于13种fda批准的pdt。包含第一人称账户或护理者视角的帖子被包括在内,并进行主题分析,以确定与用户体验相关的反复出现的主题。生成描述性统计数据以支持定性研究结果。研究表明,Reddit社区提供了丰富的、特定文化的背景,塑造了PDT体验。最后分析了65篇文章的样本,每篇文章都包含第一人称或护理者的视角,讨论了13种pdt中的11种。出现的五个主要领域包括对效能的矛盾心理(信念和怀疑),参与和退出的常见模式(动机和挫折),可用性挑战(技术摩擦),以及访问的结构性障碍(保险和负担能力)。此外,用户在治疗过程中经常表达情感意义。讨论语气的差异在不同的子reddit上得到了注意:例如,r/ADHD关注的是实用的可用性,而r/depression关注的是更深层次的情感反思。这项数字人种学研究强调了整合来自Reddit等数字平台的用户生成数据的重要性,以了解pdt对现实世界的影响。虽然临床试验提供的见解有限,但社交媒体提供了更广泛、更多样化的体验,揭示了常见的可用性障碍、参与模式和访问挑战。我们的研究结果表明,社区规范、信念和期望塑造了讨论pdt的背景,在塑造用户结果和感知方面起着关键作用。上市后数字人种学为fda批准的pdt的用户体验提供了有价值的见解,这在传统的临床试验或监管过程中是无法捕获的。本研究提倡将结构化社交媒体分析作为上市后监督的一部分,以改善pdt的设计、可访问性和有效性。在Reddit这样的非正式空间倾听患者的声音,对于确保数字治疗在现实世界中取得成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信