Classical Realism, Practices, and Paradiplomacy: The International Activities of Canadian Provinces

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Grant Dawson
{"title":"Classical Realism, Practices, and Paradiplomacy: The International Activities of Canadian Provinces","authors":"Grant Dawson","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article proposes a general theory of paradiplomacy based on Hans J. Morgenthau's classical realism (emphasizing emotions) and practices. It tests this theory on Canadian provincial international activities from 1945 to 2020. Morgenthau conceives of politics as a struggle for love and power that is universal but pluralistic in its social manifestations. Practices can be found everywhere, so variegated paradiplomacy practices are a global inevitability. The article argues that the provinces filter paradiplomacy through a distinct practice called the “diplomatic tradition of Canadian federalism” as one way of engaging in domestic power politics. The article distills the practice background into a three-part social mechanism—asymmetry, ambiguity, and accommodation—and in the case study confirms it using a version of process tracing and practitioner interviews. The article's theory is not only plausible; it is also necessary because the paradiplomacy field lacks a theory on which to found assumptions that can be integrated into IR paradigms and trajectories, such as emotions, practices, and the renewed interest in classical realism.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 2","pages":"246-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes a general theory of paradiplomacy based on Hans J. Morgenthau's classical realism (emphasizing emotions) and practices. It tests this theory on Canadian provincial international activities from 1945 to 2020. Morgenthau conceives of politics as a struggle for love and power that is universal but pluralistic in its social manifestations. Practices can be found everywhere, so variegated paradiplomacy practices are a global inevitability. The article argues that the provinces filter paradiplomacy through a distinct practice called the “diplomatic tradition of Canadian federalism” as one way of engaging in domestic power politics. The article distills the practice background into a three-part social mechanism—asymmetry, ambiguity, and accommodation—and in the case study confirms it using a version of process tracing and practitioner interviews. The article's theory is not only plausible; it is also necessary because the paradiplomacy field lacks a theory on which to found assumptions that can be integrated into IR paradigms and trajectories, such as emotions, practices, and the renewed interest in classical realism.

古典现实主义、实践与准外交:加拿大各省的国际活动
本文以摩根索的古典现实主义(强调情感)理论和实践为基础,提出了一种泛外交理论。它以1945年至2020年加拿大省级国际活动为例验证了这一理论。摩根索认为政治是对爱和权力的斗争,这种斗争是普遍的,但在其社会表现形式上是多元的。实践随处可见,因此多元的副外交实践在全球是不可避免的。文章认为,各省通过一种被称为“加拿大联邦制外交传统”的独特实践来过滤准外交,作为参与国内权力政治的一种方式。这篇文章将实践背景提炼成一个由三部分组成的社会机制——不对称、模糊和适应——并在案例研究中使用过程追踪和从业者访谈的方式来证实这一点。这篇文章的理论不仅似是而非;这也是必要的,因为副外交领域缺乏一种理论,可以在此基础上发现可以融入国际关系范式和轨迹的假设,如情感、实践和对古典现实主义的重新兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信