Consumer preferences for public EV charging tariffs and infrastructure reliability: A choice experiment

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Peter Letmathe, Dustin Sperling, Richard Woeste
{"title":"Consumer preferences for public EV charging tariffs and infrastructure reliability: A choice experiment","authors":"Peter Letmathe,&nbsp;Dustin Sperling,&nbsp;Richard Woeste","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public charging infrastructure (CIS) and its corresponding tariffs are becoming increasingly important for growing the market share of electric vehicles. To investigate the optimal design of such tariffs by gaining a better understanding of how consumers value the different attributes and the reliability of CIS, a choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted with 516 participants in Germany. Results suggest that the energy price is the most important attribute. However, unlimited tariffs are not perceived as being the most beneficial: A medium energy price combined with a moderate monthly fee is considered the most attractive option across the sample. Increased reliability provides high utility compared to the current status quo of about 80 % successful charging sessions. Additional services, such as a towing service or a mobility guarantee, are not regarded as beneficial by most participants. Policies should focus on ensuring competition for attractive charging prices and for sufficient and reliable CIS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"170 ","pages":"Pages 147-162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public charging infrastructure (CIS) and its corresponding tariffs are becoming increasingly important for growing the market share of electric vehicles. To investigate the optimal design of such tariffs by gaining a better understanding of how consumers value the different attributes and the reliability of CIS, a choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted with 516 participants in Germany. Results suggest that the energy price is the most important attribute. However, unlimited tariffs are not perceived as being the most beneficial: A medium energy price combined with a moderate monthly fee is considered the most attractive option across the sample. Increased reliability provides high utility compared to the current status quo of about 80 % successful charging sessions. Additional services, such as a towing service or a mobility guarantee, are not regarded as beneficial by most participants. Policies should focus on ensuring competition for attractive charging prices and for sufficient and reliable CIS.
消费者对公共电动汽车充电电价和基础设施可靠性的偏好:一个选择实验
公共充电基础设施(CIS)及其相应的收费标准对于提高电动汽车的市场份额变得越来越重要。为了通过更好地了解消费者如何评价不同属性和CIS的可靠性来研究此类关税的最佳设计,我们对德国的516名参与者进行了基于选择的联合分析。结果表明,能源价格是最重要的属性。然而,无限制的关税并不是最有利的:中等能源价格加上适度的月费被认为是样本中最具吸引力的选择。与目前约80%的充电成功率相比,可靠性的提高提供了更高的实用性。额外的服务,如拖曳服务或流动性保证,被大多数参与者认为是没有好处的。政策应侧重于确保竞争以获得有吸引力的收费价格和足够和可靠的独联体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信