Post-doctoral fellow and faculty perceptions and experiences of inclusion at academic medical centers.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.21
Chantele Mitchell-Miland, Doris M Rubio, Tiffany L Gary-Webb, Galen Switzer, Gretchen E White, Natalia E Morone, Audrey J Murrell, Megan Hamm
{"title":"Post-doctoral fellow and faculty perceptions and experiences of inclusion at academic medical centers.","authors":"Chantele Mitchell-Miland, Doris M Rubio, Tiffany L Gary-Webb, Galen Switzer, Gretchen E White, Natalia E Morone, Audrey J Murrell, Megan Hamm","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this research was to understand perceptions and experiences of inclusion among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers (postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty) enrolled in the Building Up study. Because inclusion is vital to job satisfaction and engagement, our goal was to shed light on aspects of and barriers to inclusion within the academic workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used qualitative interviews to assess workplace experiences of 25 underrepresented postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty including: their daily work experiences; sense of the workplace culture within the institutions; experiences with microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and whether the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and practices at their institution enhanced their experiences. Using qualitative methods, we identified themes that highlighted high-level characteristics of inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four distinct themes were identified: (1) participants appreciated the flexibility, versatility, and sense of fulfillment of their positions which enhanced feelings of inclusion; (2) greater psychological safety led to a greater sense of belonging to a research community; (3) participants had varied experiences of inclusion in the presence of microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and (4) access to opportunities and resources increased feelings of value within the workplace.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings provide new insight into how inclusion is experienced within the institution among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers. This research points to specific approaches that could be used to enhance experiences of inclusion and to address barriers. More research is needed to understand how to accomplish a balance between the two, so that perceptions of inclusion outweigh negative experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this research was to understand perceptions and experiences of inclusion among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers (postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty) enrolled in the Building Up study. Because inclusion is vital to job satisfaction and engagement, our goal was to shed light on aspects of and barriers to inclusion within the academic workforce.

Methods: We used qualitative interviews to assess workplace experiences of 25 underrepresented postdoctoral fellows and early-career faculty including: their daily work experiences; sense of the workplace culture within the institutions; experiences with microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and whether the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and practices at their institution enhanced their experiences. Using qualitative methods, we identified themes that highlighted high-level characteristics of inclusion.

Results: Four distinct themes were identified: (1) participants appreciated the flexibility, versatility, and sense of fulfillment of their positions which enhanced feelings of inclusion; (2) greater psychological safety led to a greater sense of belonging to a research community; (3) participants had varied experiences of inclusion in the presence of microaggressions, racism, and discrimination; and (4) access to opportunities and resources increased feelings of value within the workplace.

Discussion: Our findings provide new insight into how inclusion is experienced within the institution among underrepresented early-career biomedical researchers. This research points to specific approaches that could be used to enhance experiences of inclusion and to address barriers. More research is needed to understand how to accomplish a balance between the two, so that perceptions of inclusion outweigh negative experiences.

博士后研究员和教师对学术医疗中心包容的看法和经验。
本研究的目的是了解参与Building Up研究的未被充分代表的早期职业生物医学研究人员(博士后研究员和早期职业教师)对包容性的看法和经验。因为包容性对工作满意度和敬业度至关重要,我们的目标是阐明学术劳动力中包容性的各个方面和障碍。方法:采用定性访谈法对25名未被充分代表的博士后和早期职业教师的工作经历进行评估,包括:他们的日常工作经历;了解机构内的工作场所文化;经历过微侵犯、种族主义和歧视;以及他们所在机构的多元化、公平和包容(DEI)政策和做法是否增强了他们的经历。使用定性方法,我们确定了突出包容性高水平特征的主题。结果表明:(1)被试对职位的灵活性、多功能性和成就感有较高的评价,这增强了他们的包容感;(2)心理安全感越强,对科研群体的归属感越强;(3)被试对微侵犯、种族主义和歧视存在不同的包容体验;(4)获得机会和资源增加了工作场所的价值感。讨论:我们的研究结果提供了新的见解,了解在代表性不足的早期职业生物医学研究人员中,如何在机构内体验到包容性。这项研究指出了可以用来增强包容体验和解决障碍的具体方法。需要更多的研究来了解如何在两者之间取得平衡,以便包容的感觉超过负面体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信