Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.51
Shannon Sanchez-Youngman, Belkis Jacquez, Prajakta Adsul, Elizabeth Dickson, Tabia Henry Akintobi, LaShawn Hoffman, Lisa G Rosas, Starla Gay, Jason A Mendoza, Diane Mapes, John Oetzel, Donald Nease, Nina Wallerstein
{"title":"Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.","authors":"Shannon Sanchez-Youngman, Belkis Jacquez, Prajakta Adsul, Elizabeth Dickson, Tabia Henry Akintobi, LaShawn Hoffman, Lisa G Rosas, Starla Gay, Jason A Mendoza, Diane Mapes, John Oetzel, Donald Nease, Nina Wallerstein","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and patient/ community engaged research (P/CEnR) are shown to be effective approaches that improve health inequities, particularly among disadvantaged populations. While the science of CBPR demonstrates promising partnering practices that lead to effective interventions, there are institutional and structural barriers to creating and sustaining patient/community research within academic health centers (AHCs). As the field matures, there is a growing need to enhance patient/community leadership so that communities can set their own research agendas and priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Engage for Equity PLUS sought to address these challenges by implementing an engagement intervention aimed at transforming AHCs through supporting champion teams of academic, community, and patient partners to strengthen research infrastructures for P/CEnR. This paper uses a qualitative, case study analysis to describe how E2PLUS enabled champion teams at Stanford School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, and Morehouse School of Medicine to pursue institutional change strategies through coaching, workshops, contextual data analysis, and a community of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper describes key themes of how E2Plus helped identify targets of change by a) using institutional data collection as core to generating critical consciousness of contextual conditions; b) implementing feasible E2PLUS strategies to leverage conditions for catalyzing a champion team for advocacy and achievable actions; c) identifying the critical role of patients/community members in stimulating change; and d) the role of continual collective reflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We discuss the overall implications for E2 PLUS for other AHCs working toward sustainable community/patient engaged research policies and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and patient/ community engaged research (P/CEnR) are shown to be effective approaches that improve health inequities, particularly among disadvantaged populations. While the science of CBPR demonstrates promising partnering practices that lead to effective interventions, there are institutional and structural barriers to creating and sustaining patient/community research within academic health centers (AHCs). As the field matures, there is a growing need to enhance patient/community leadership so that communities can set their own research agendas and priorities.

Methods: Engage for Equity PLUS sought to address these challenges by implementing an engagement intervention aimed at transforming AHCs through supporting champion teams of academic, community, and patient partners to strengthen research infrastructures for P/CEnR. This paper uses a qualitative, case study analysis to describe how E2PLUS enabled champion teams at Stanford School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, and Morehouse School of Medicine to pursue institutional change strategies through coaching, workshops, contextual data analysis, and a community of practice.

Results: This paper describes key themes of how E2Plus helped identify targets of change by a) using institutional data collection as core to generating critical consciousness of contextual conditions; b) implementing feasible E2PLUS strategies to leverage conditions for catalyzing a champion team for advocacy and achievable actions; c) identifying the critical role of patients/community members in stimulating change; and d) the role of continual collective reflection.

Conclusion: We discuss the overall implications for E2 PLUS for other AHCs working toward sustainable community/patient engaged research policies and practices.

参与公平+:转变学术卫生中心,以维持患者/社区参与的研究结构、政策和实践。
导论:基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)和患者/社区参与研究(P/CEnR)已被证明是改善卫生不公平现象的有效方法,特别是在弱势群体中。虽然CBPR的科学证明了有希望的伙伴合作做法,可以导致有效的干预措施,但在学术卫生中心(AHCs)内建立和维持患者/社区研究方面存在体制和结构性障碍。随着该领域的成熟,越来越需要加强患者/社区的领导,以便社区可以制定自己的研究议程和优先事项。方法:Engage for Equity PLUS试图通过实施参与干预来应对这些挑战,该干预旨在通过支持学术、社区和患者合作伙伴的冠军团队来改变ahc,以加强P/CEnR的研究基础设施。本文采用定性的案例研究分析,描述了E2PLUS如何使斯坦福大学医学院、弗雷德·哈钦森/华盛顿大学癌症联盟和莫尔豪斯医学院的冠军团队通过指导、研讨会、背景数据分析和实践社区来追求制度变革战略。结果:本文描述了E2Plus如何通过以下方式帮助确定变革目标的关键主题:a)使用机构数据收集作为核心,以产生对上下文条件的批判性意识;b)实施可行的E2PLUS战略,以利用条件催化冠军团队进行宣传和可实现的行动;C)确定患者/社区成员在促进变革中的关键作用;d)持续集体反思的作用。结论:我们讨论了E2 PLUS对其他AHCs致力于可持续社区/患者参与研究政策和实践的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信