How does research output and impact in medical informatics vary among EU member states? - A bibliometric analysis.

Giovani M Goron, Razvan M Chereches
{"title":"How does research output and impact in medical informatics vary among EU member states? - A bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Giovani M Goron, Razvan M Chereches","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2025-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates how research output and impact in medical informatics vary among EU member states before and during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing publication volume, impact metrics, collaboration patterns, and open-access trends. It seeks to identify regional disparities, highlight key research themes, and provide insights for researchers, the public, and policymakers to promote equitable access, collaboration, and investment in medical informatics across the EU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was performed using Clarivate Web of Science and InCites databases, encompassing 6,620 articles from 47 medical informatics journals published between 2018 and 2022. Metrics such as cumulative impact factors, article counts, and collaboration trends were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified substantial regional disparities in research output and impact. Western European countries, including Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain, consistently led in article volume and cumulative impact factors, while Eastern European countries showed lower engagement. Collaboration metrics revealed that 66 % of publications involved international partnerships, showcasing strong cross-border cooperation within the EU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the uneven distribution of research productivity in medical informatics across the EU. The findings underline the importance of international partnerships and equitable access to research in advancing medical informatics and addressing evolving healthcare challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":93905,"journal":{"name":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2025-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates how research output and impact in medical informatics vary among EU member states before and during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing publication volume, impact metrics, collaboration patterns, and open-access trends. It seeks to identify regional disparities, highlight key research themes, and provide insights for researchers, the public, and policymakers to promote equitable access, collaboration, and investment in medical informatics across the EU.

Methods: A bibliometric analysis was performed using Clarivate Web of Science and InCites databases, encompassing 6,620 articles from 47 medical informatics journals published between 2018 and 2022. Metrics such as cumulative impact factors, article counts, and collaboration trends were analyzed.

Results: Our analysis identified substantial regional disparities in research output and impact. Western European countries, including Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain, consistently led in article volume and cumulative impact factors, while Eastern European countries showed lower engagement. Collaboration metrics revealed that 66 % of publications involved international partnerships, showcasing strong cross-border cooperation within the EU.

Conclusions: This study highlights the uneven distribution of research productivity in medical informatics across the EU. The findings underline the importance of international partnerships and equitable access to research in advancing medical informatics and addressing evolving healthcare challenges.

欧盟成员国在医学信息学方面的研究产出和影响有何不同?-文献计量分析。
目的:本研究通过分析出版物数量、影响指标、协作模式和开放获取趋势,评估欧盟成员国在COVID-19大流行之前和期间医学信息学的研究产出和影响的差异。它旨在确定区域差异,突出关键的研究主题,并为研究人员、公众和政策制定者提供见解,以促进整个欧盟医疗信息学的公平获取、合作和投资。方法:使用Clarivate Web of Science和InCites数据库进行文献计量学分析,包括2018年至2022年间发表的47种医学信息学期刊的6620篇文章。分析了诸如累积影响因子、文章数量和协作趋势等度量。结果:我们的分析确定了研究产出和影响方面的重大区域差异。包括德国、荷兰和西班牙在内的西欧国家在文章数量和累积影响因子方面一直处于领先地位,而东欧国家的参与度较低。合作指标显示,66% %的出版物涉及国际合作伙伴关系,展示了欧盟内部强大的跨境合作。结论:本研究突出了整个欧盟医学信息学研究生产力分布的不均衡。研究结果强调了国际伙伴关系和公平获取研究成果在推进医学信息学和应对不断变化的卫生保健挑战方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信