The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.

Tim Lomas, Matt Bradshaw, Brendan Case, Richard G Cowden, Steve Crabtree, Cynthia English, Alex Fogleman, Kathryn A Johnson, Zacc Ritter, Byron R Johnson, Tyler J VanderWeele
{"title":"The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.","authors":"Tim Lomas, Matt Bradshaw, Brendan Case, Richard G Cowden, Steve Crabtree, Cynthia English, Alex Fogleman, Kathryn A Johnson, Zacc Ritter, Byron R Johnson, Tyler J VanderWeele","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the well-founded critiques of academia as Western-centric, there are increasing efforts to conduct research that is more cross-cultural and global. These dynamics apply to all aspects of life, including human flourishing, as exemplified by the new Global Flourishing Study (GFS), a longitudinal panel study investigating the predictors and components of flourishing across over 200,000 participants from 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong [S.A.R of China, with mainland China also included from 2024 onwards], Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Tanzania, Turkey, UK, and USA). The research is not only comprehensive in its global reach but also its conceptual coverage of flourishing, involving 109 distinct questions (comprising a one-off intake survey of 43 items and an annual survey of 71 items, with five items shared by both). This paper elucidates the questionnaire development process, giving a transparent and open accounting of its multi-phase construction. By describing this process in detail, this article not only articulates the nature of the GFS but also serves as a useful resource in the survey development literature more broadly (e.g., for scholars undertaking similar endeavors).</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the well-founded critiques of academia as Western-centric, there are increasing efforts to conduct research that is more cross-cultural and global. These dynamics apply to all aspects of life, including human flourishing, as exemplified by the new Global Flourishing Study (GFS), a longitudinal panel study investigating the predictors and components of flourishing across over 200,000 participants from 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong [S.A.R of China, with mainland China also included from 2024 onwards], Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Tanzania, Turkey, UK, and USA). The research is not only comprehensive in its global reach but also its conceptual coverage of flourishing, involving 109 distinct questions (comprising a one-off intake survey of 43 items and an annual survey of 71 items, with five items shared by both). This paper elucidates the questionnaire development process, giving a transparent and open accounting of its multi-phase construction. By describing this process in detail, this article not only articulates the nature of the GFS but also serves as a useful resource in the survey development literature more broadly (e.g., for scholars undertaking similar endeavors).

全球繁荣研究问卷的发展:绘制一个新的109项人类繁荣清单的演变图。
鉴于学术界以西方为中心的批评是有根据的,人们越来越多地努力进行跨文化和全球化的研究。这些动态适用于生活的各个方面,包括人类繁荣,正如新的全球繁荣研究(GFS)所例证的那样,这是一项纵向小组研究,调查了来自22个地理和文化多样化国家(阿根廷,澳大利亚,巴西,香港[S.A.])的200,000多名参与者的繁荣预测因素和组成部分(从2024年起,中国大陆也包括在内)、埃及、德国、印度、印度尼西亚、以色列、日本、肯尼亚、墨西哥、尼日利亚、菲律宾、波兰、南非、西班牙、瑞典、坦桑尼亚、土耳其、英国和美国。这项研究不仅在全球范围内全面,而且在概念上涵盖了繁荣,涉及109个不同的问题(包括43个项目的一次性调查和71个项目的年度调查,其中5个项目由两者共享)。本文阐述了问卷的开发过程,对问卷的多阶段构建进行了透明、公开的阐述。通过对这一过程的详细描述,本文不仅阐明了GFS的本质,而且还为更广泛的调查发展文献(例如,为从事类似工作的学者)提供了有用的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信