{"title":"Effects of Cleaning Protocols on Resin Bond Strength to Saliva-Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia.","authors":"Ozge Genc, Necla Demir, Mutlu Özcan","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Considering the significant weakening of the bonding of resin cements to saliva-contaminated zirconia restorations, this study aimed to investigate the effect of various surface treatment methods on the bonding of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia after various cleansing methods.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 105 monolithic zirconia specimens were cut from pre-sintered blocks using a water-cooled precision diamond saw. Specimens were kept in the artificial saliva except for the control group. The specimens were then cleaned using one of the following methods: 1. Air-water spray, 2. Isopropyl Alcohol, 3. Pumice, 4. Universal cleaning agent (Ivoclean), 5. Sandblasting, 6. Sandblasting + Ivoclean. Specimens were bonded to self-adhesive resin cement. Specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles after cementation and tested in shear mode (1 mm/min). Images were obtained using a stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were performed with the Duncan test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean shear bond strength values were as follows in descending order: Sandblasting + Ivoclean (9.3 MPa) > sandblasting (8.59 MPa) > Ivoclean (7.21 MPa) > Pumice (4.82 MPa) > Air-water spray (4.15 MPa) > Control (3.65 MPa) > Isopropyl alcohol (3.04 MPa). Significant difference was observed between sandblasting and Ivoclean groups, and between sandblasting and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups (P 0.05). A significant difference was also found between the Ivoclean and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups. The groups treated with sandblasting + Ivoclean, sandblasting, and Ivoclean showed a significant difference compared to all other surface treatment groups. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength among the control, air-water, alcohol, and pumice groups (P > 0.05). Sandblasting, Ivoclean, and Ivo-clean after sandblasting applications were found to deliver significantly higher (P 0.05) adhesion compared with air-water, pumice, and alcohol applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsequent applications of Ivoclean after sandblasting established a stronger bond between self-adhesive resin cement and monolithic zirconia than other cleaning methods tested.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Following airborne particle abrasion, intaglio surfaces of zirconia restorations should best be cleaned using Ivoclean.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_2011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Considering the significant weakening of the bonding of resin cements to saliva-contaminated zirconia restorations, this study aimed to investigate the effect of various surface treatment methods on the bonding of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia after various cleansing methods.
Material and methods: A total of 105 monolithic zirconia specimens were cut from pre-sintered blocks using a water-cooled precision diamond saw. Specimens were kept in the artificial saliva except for the control group. The specimens were then cleaned using one of the following methods: 1. Air-water spray, 2. Isopropyl Alcohol, 3. Pumice, 4. Universal cleaning agent (Ivoclean), 5. Sandblasting, 6. Sandblasting + Ivoclean. Specimens were bonded to self-adhesive resin cement. Specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles after cementation and tested in shear mode (1 mm/min). Images were obtained using a stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were performed with the Duncan test (α = 0.05).
Results: The mean shear bond strength values were as follows in descending order: Sandblasting + Ivoclean (9.3 MPa) > sandblasting (8.59 MPa) > Ivoclean (7.21 MPa) > Pumice (4.82 MPa) > Air-water spray (4.15 MPa) > Control (3.65 MPa) > Isopropyl alcohol (3.04 MPa). Significant difference was observed between sandblasting and Ivoclean groups, and between sandblasting and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups (P 0.05). A significant difference was also found between the Ivoclean and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups. The groups treated with sandblasting + Ivoclean, sandblasting, and Ivoclean showed a significant difference compared to all other surface treatment groups. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength among the control, air-water, alcohol, and pumice groups (P > 0.05). Sandblasting, Ivoclean, and Ivo-clean after sandblasting applications were found to deliver significantly higher (P 0.05) adhesion compared with air-water, pumice, and alcohol applications.
Conclusions: Subsequent applications of Ivoclean after sandblasting established a stronger bond between self-adhesive resin cement and monolithic zirconia than other cleaning methods tested.
Clinical implications: Following airborne particle abrasion, intaglio surfaces of zirconia restorations should best be cleaned using Ivoclean.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
