Recommendations and Best Practices for the Risk Assessment of Pressure Injuries in Adults Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Ricardo Picoito, Tânia Manuel, Sofia Vieira, Rita Azevedo, Elisabete Nunes, Paulo Alves
{"title":"Recommendations and Best Practices for the Risk Assessment of Pressure Injuries in Adults Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ricardo Picoito, Tânia Manuel, Sofia Vieira, Rita Azevedo, Elisabete Nunes, Paulo Alves","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15040128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: The prevention of pressure injuries depends on the early and correct assessment of at-risk patients. Since risk assessment involves more than using a risk factor instrument, we intend to map the existing recommendations and statements of good practice for pressure injury risk assessment in adults admitted to intensive care units, as well as identify the strengths of the evidence and recommendations in the literature. <b>Methods</b>: This study is a scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted as a guide for writing this study. <b>Results</b>: Searches were carried out in six databases, resulting in 794 studies, of which 15 were included. The recommendations and statements of good practice were grouped into five categories: risk assessment instruments, skin assessment, medical device surveillance, other alternatives to risk assessment, and implementing best practices in clinical settings. The strengths of the evidence and recommendations were identified when available in the literature. <i>Conclusions</i>: The mapping showed that the evidence is sufficient to indicate recommendations and statements of good practice for the risk assessment of pressure injuries in adults admitted to intensive care units. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework on the 4th of August of 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevention of pressure injuries depends on the early and correct assessment of at-risk patients. Since risk assessment involves more than using a risk factor instrument, we intend to map the existing recommendations and statements of good practice for pressure injury risk assessment in adults admitted to intensive care units, as well as identify the strengths of the evidence and recommendations in the literature. Methods: This study is a scoping review, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted as a guide for writing this study. Results: Searches were carried out in six databases, resulting in 794 studies, of which 15 were included. The recommendations and statements of good practice were grouped into five categories: risk assessment instruments, skin assessment, medical device surveillance, other alternatives to risk assessment, and implementing best practices in clinical settings. The strengths of the evidence and recommendations were identified when available in the literature. Conclusions: The mapping showed that the evidence is sufficient to indicate recommendations and statements of good practice for the risk assessment of pressure injuries in adults admitted to intensive care units. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework on the 4th of August of 2023.

重症监护病房成人压力损伤风险评估的建议和最佳实践:范围审查。
背景:压伤的预防取决于对高危患者的早期正确评估。由于风险评估涉及的不仅仅是使用风险因素工具,我们打算绘制现有的建议和对重症监护病房成人压力损伤风险评估的良好实践声明,并确定文献中证据和建议的优势。方法:本研究在乔安娜布里格斯研究所框架的指导下进行范围审查。本研究采用了系统评价和元分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目作为写作指南。结果:在6个数据库中进行了检索,得到794项研究,其中15项被纳入。关于良好做法的建议和说明分为五类:风险评估工具、皮肤评估、医疗设备监测、风险评估的其他替代方案以及在临床环境中实施最佳做法。证据和建议的优势在文献中得到确认。结论:该地图显示,证据是足够的,表明建议和良好的做法声明的风险评估成人压力损伤入住重症监护病房。该方案于2023年8月4日在开放科学框架中回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信