Transoral septotomy versus Z-POEM in the treatment of Zenker diverticulum: a multicenter case-matched comparative study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Luca Provenzano, Stefano Siboni, Giovanni Capovilla, Pamela Milito, Cesare Cutrone, Matteo Pittacolo, Lucia Moletta, Michele Valmasoni, Emanuele Luigi Giuseppe Asti, Renato Salvador
{"title":"Transoral septotomy versus Z-POEM in the treatment of Zenker diverticulum: a multicenter case-matched comparative study.","authors":"Luca Provenzano, Stefano Siboni, Giovanni Capovilla, Pamela Milito, Cesare Cutrone, Matteo Pittacolo, Lucia Moletta, Michele Valmasoni, Emanuele Luigi Giuseppe Asti, Renato Salvador","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11746-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transoral septotomy has become the favored treatment of Zenker Diverticulum (ZD), with POEM becoming a mini-invasive option also in ZD. The gold-standard treatment of ZD is still debated. We designed a case-matched comparative study to evaluate whether POEM (Z-POEM) could be as effective as stapler, traction-assisted Transoral Septotomy (TS) as first-line treatment of ZD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consecutive naïve patients between 2015 and 2022 were enrolled in two high-volume centers. Barium-swallow and endoscopy were performed before and after surgery. Symptoms were assessed using a dedicated questionnaire. A control group was generated by matching patients who underwent Z-POEM with those who underwent TS. For matching the patients, a one-to-one nearest neighbor approach was used. Patients were matched for: septum length, symptoms duration, age, and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 26 patients in each group were enrolled. The procedures were completed successfully in all patients in both groups, and mortality was null. TS required a shorter operative time. One leakage was detected in the Z-POEM group while one mucosal tear was detected in the TS group, both treated conservatively. At a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR: 27-68) for TS and 66 months (IQR: 58-76) for Z-POEM, a successful outcome was achieved in 96.2% in both groups. Post-operative symptom scores decreased in all patients in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study comparing Z-POEM and TS. Both the minimally invasive treatments are effective for naïve Zenker Diverticulum. TS provides a lower rate of intraoperative complications and a shorter operative time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3832-3838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11746-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transoral septotomy has become the favored treatment of Zenker Diverticulum (ZD), with POEM becoming a mini-invasive option also in ZD. The gold-standard treatment of ZD is still debated. We designed a case-matched comparative study to evaluate whether POEM (Z-POEM) could be as effective as stapler, traction-assisted Transoral Septotomy (TS) as first-line treatment of ZD.

Materials and methods: Consecutive naïve patients between 2015 and 2022 were enrolled in two high-volume centers. Barium-swallow and endoscopy were performed before and after surgery. Symptoms were assessed using a dedicated questionnaire. A control group was generated by matching patients who underwent Z-POEM with those who underwent TS. For matching the patients, a one-to-one nearest neighbor approach was used. Patients were matched for: septum length, symptoms duration, age, and sex.

Results: After matching, 26 patients in each group were enrolled. The procedures were completed successfully in all patients in both groups, and mortality was null. TS required a shorter operative time. One leakage was detected in the Z-POEM group while one mucosal tear was detected in the TS group, both treated conservatively. At a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR: 27-68) for TS and 66 months (IQR: 58-76) for Z-POEM, a successful outcome was achieved in 96.2% in both groups. Post-operative symptom scores decreased in all patients in both groups.

Conclusions: This is the first study comparing Z-POEM and TS. Both the minimally invasive treatments are effective for naïve Zenker Diverticulum. TS provides a lower rate of intraoperative complications and a shorter operative time.

经口中隔切开术与Z-POEM治疗Zenker憩室:一项多中心病例匹配的比较研究。
简介:经口鼻中隔切开术已成为Zenker憩室(ZD)的首选治疗方法,POEM也成为ZD的微创治疗选择。ZD的黄金标准治疗方法仍存在争议。我们设计了一项病例匹配的比较研究,以评估POEM (Z-POEM)作为ZD的一线治疗是否与吻合器、牵引辅助经口鼻中隔切开术(TS)一样有效。材料和方法:2015年至2022年期间,在两个大容量中心连续招募naïve患者。术前、术后均行钡餐及内镜检查。使用专门的问卷对症状进行评估。将Z-POEM患者与TS患者进行配对,形成对照组。配对患者采用一对一最近邻方法。患者匹配:隔膜长度、症状持续时间、年龄和性别。结果:配对后,每组入组26例。两组患者均成功完成手术,死亡率为零。TS手术时间较短。Z-POEM组1例渗漏,TS组1例粘膜撕裂,均予保守治疗。TS组的中位随访时间为45个月(IQR: 27-68), Z-POEM组的中位随访时间为66个月(IQR: 58-76),两组患者的成功率均为96.2%。两组患者术后症状评分均下降。结论:这是Z-POEM与TS的首次比较研究,两种微创治疗naïve Zenker憩室均有效。TS术中并发症发生率低,手术时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信