Ocular radiation exposure of the primary operator performing selective coronary angiography from a radial artery approach.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Richard Casazza, Bilal Malik, Arsalan Hashmi, Joshua Fogel, Enrico Montagna, Darren Gibson, Andres Palacio, Habiba Beginyazova, Robert Frankel, Jacob Shani
{"title":"Ocular radiation exposure of the primary operator performing selective coronary angiography from a radial artery approach.","authors":"Richard Casazza, Bilal Malik, Arsalan Hashmi, Joshua Fogel, Enrico Montagna, Darren Gibson, Andres Palacio, Habiba Beginyazova, Robert Frankel, Jacob Shani","doi":"10.25270/jic/25.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation exposure is one of the most adverse occupational hazards faced by interventional cardiologists. The lens of the eye is considered highly radiosensitive. The left eye (LE) is at considerably more risk of radiation-induced cataracts than the right eye (RE) due to its proximity to the radiation source during cardiac catheterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study (n = 534) assessed the cumulative radiation (CR) exposure in microsieverts (μSv) and the normalized radiation exposure (CR/DAP) to the LE and RE of the primary operator when using a radial artery approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole sample, median CR (LE: 3 vs RE: 1, P less than .001) and median CR/DAP (LE: 0.11 vs RE: 0.03, P les than .001) were higher for the LE than the RE. This same pattern occurred in separate analyses of both radial artery approaches, regardless of patient sex, height, or body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiation exposure to the LE compared with the RE of interventional cardiologists is significantly more during selective coronary angiography using a radial artery approach. The authors recommend the use of radioprotective glasses in conjunction with an optimally placed ceiling-mounted shield to minimize ocular radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/25.00074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiation exposure is one of the most adverse occupational hazards faced by interventional cardiologists. The lens of the eye is considered highly radiosensitive. The left eye (LE) is at considerably more risk of radiation-induced cataracts than the right eye (RE) due to its proximity to the radiation source during cardiac catheterization.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study (n = 534) assessed the cumulative radiation (CR) exposure in microsieverts (μSv) and the normalized radiation exposure (CR/DAP) to the LE and RE of the primary operator when using a radial artery approach.

Results: In the whole sample, median CR (LE: 3 vs RE: 1, P less than .001) and median CR/DAP (LE: 0.11 vs RE: 0.03, P les than .001) were higher for the LE than the RE. This same pattern occurred in separate analyses of both radial artery approaches, regardless of patient sex, height, or body mass index.

Conclusions: Radiation exposure to the LE compared with the RE of interventional cardiologists is significantly more during selective coronary angiography using a radial artery approach. The authors recommend the use of radioprotective glasses in conjunction with an optimally placed ceiling-mounted shield to minimize ocular radiation exposure.

从桡动脉入路进行选择性冠状动脉造影的主要操作者的眼部辐射暴露。
背景:辐射暴露是介入心脏病专家面临的最不利的职业危害之一。眼睛的晶状体被认为是高度辐射敏感的。由于在心导管置入术中左眼靠近辐射源,其发生放射性白内障的风险比右眼大得多。方法:本单中心回顾性研究(n = 534)评估了桡动脉入路时主要操作者的累积辐射(CR)暴露量(μSv)和标准化辐射暴露量(CR/DAP)。结果:在整个样本中,LE的中位CR (LE: 3 vs RE: 1, P < 0.001)和中位CR/DAP (LE: 0.11 vs RE: 0.03, P < 0.001)高于RE。在两种桡动脉入路的单独分析中也出现了相同的模式,无论患者性别、身高或体重指数如何。结论:在选择桡动脉入路的冠状动脉造影中,与介入心脏病专家的RE相比,LE的辐射暴露明显更多。作者建议使用辐射防护眼镜和最佳放置在天花板上的防护罩,以尽量减少眼部辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信