Savanna Kerstiens, Courtney Lynam Scherr, Maia Jacobs, Allison J Carroll, Monisola Jayeoba, Elyse Renee Daly, Siobhan M Phillips, Brian Hitsman, Sofia F Garcia, Bonnie Spring
{"title":"Speaking of survival: oncologists' approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors.","authors":"Savanna Kerstiens, Courtney Lynam Scherr, Maia Jacobs, Allison J Carroll, Monisola Jayeoba, Elyse Renee Daly, Siobhan M Phillips, Brian Hitsman, Sofia F Garcia, Bonnie Spring","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01798-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored oncologists' reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients' self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The oncologists' reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias-where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Oncologists' benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01798-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study explored oncologists' reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients' self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.
Conclusion: The oncologists' reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias-where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.
Implications for cancer survivors: Oncologists' benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.