Speaking of survival: oncologists' approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Savanna Kerstiens, Courtney Lynam Scherr, Maia Jacobs, Allison J Carroll, Monisola Jayeoba, Elyse Renee Daly, Siobhan M Phillips, Brian Hitsman, Sofia F Garcia, Bonnie Spring
{"title":"Speaking of survival: oncologists' approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors.","authors":"Savanna Kerstiens, Courtney Lynam Scherr, Maia Jacobs, Allison J Carroll, Monisola Jayeoba, Elyse Renee Daly, Siobhan M Phillips, Brian Hitsman, Sofia F Garcia, Bonnie Spring","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01798-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored oncologists' reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients' self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The oncologists' reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias-where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Oncologists' benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01798-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored oncologists' reported conversations with adult cancer survivors about three modifiable risk behaviors: poor diet, smoking, and insufficient physical activity. These behaviors can increase disease recurrence and early mortality. By asking oncologists to report their approach to these discussions, we can begin to identify areas for improvement.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 oncology clinicians from various subspecialties. We identified themes using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Four major themes were identified. Participants reported only sometimes explicitly discussing risk behaviors and avoiding sensitive topics like weight. They described tailoring their conversations around what they believe a patient can handle to maintain a positive relationship or avoid hurting patients' self-image. Participants explained that they rely on specialists or programs for specific risk management strategies and indicated that patients most often initiate conversations about lifestyle risks. Participants avoided or indirectly discussed lifestyle risks.

Conclusion: The oncologists' reported risk communication with survivors suggested a delicate balance between patient-centered communication and benevolent bias-where oncologists tailor conversations based on their perceptions of what a patient can handle. Indirect discussions may lead survivors to undervalue the importance of addressing these risks. To enhance communication effectiveness and avoid unmanaged risk behaviors, oncologists need support to be more fully engaged in specific risk management conversations with cancer survivors.

Implications for cancer survivors: Oncologists' benevolent bias may lead to inadequate risk management by the clinician and result in survivors underestimating the importance of specific risk factors, potentially leading to poorer health outcomes.

说到生存:肿瘤学家与癌症幸存者进行风险行为对话的方法。
目的:本研究探讨了肿瘤学家与成年癌症幸存者关于三种可改变的风险行为的对话:不良饮食、吸烟和体育锻炼不足。这些行为会增加疾病复发和早期死亡率。通过要求肿瘤学家报告他们对这些讨论的方法,我们可以开始确定需要改进的领域。方法:我们对来自不同亚专科的17名肿瘤临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。我们使用归纳主题分析来确定主题。结果:确定了四个主要主题。参与者只是有时会明确地讨论风险行为,并回避体重等敏感话题。他们描述了围绕他们认为病人可以处理的话题来调整谈话,以保持积极的关系或避免伤害病人的自我形象。参与者解释说,他们依靠专家或项目来制定具体的风险管理策略,并表示患者通常会主动谈论生活方式的风险。参与者避免或间接讨论生活方式的风险。结论:肿瘤学家报告的与幸存者的风险沟通表明,在以患者为中心的沟通和仁慈的偏见之间存在微妙的平衡——肿瘤学家根据他们对患者处理能力的看法来调整对话。间接的讨论可能导致幸存者低估解决这些风险的重要性。为了提高沟通的有效性,避免不可控的风险行为,肿瘤学家需要得到支持,以便更充分地参与到与癌症幸存者的具体风险管理对话中。对癌症幸存者的影响:肿瘤学家的善意偏见可能导致临床医生风险管理不足,导致幸存者低估特定风险因素的重要性,潜在地导致较差的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信