Working With Value Complexity in Healthcare.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lieke Oldenhof, Violet Petit-Steeghs, Rik Wehrens, Sander van Haperen, Marjolijn Heerings
{"title":"Working With Value Complexity in Healthcare.","authors":"Lieke Oldenhof, Violet Petit-Steeghs, Rik Wehrens, Sander van Haperen, Marjolijn Heerings","doi":"10.1177/10497323251330999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we argue for a rethinking of complexity in healthcare in terms of value complexity. Although widely adopted in healthcare, the positivist roots of complexity theory have thus far limited its applicability to understand the wicked nature of many healthcare challenges. We draw on a new pragmatist approach to contend that values are situated and embedded in practice, and demonstrate how values and practices co-develop in ways resembling complex systems. We employ this analytical lens in a secondary analysis of prior ethnographic and action research undertaken between 2010 and 2022 in the context of Dutch healthcare. These studies were conducted in the context of older person care and the (care) services for people with chronic diseases, disabilities, and mental illness. Based on our findings, we bring forward a layered conceptualization of value complexity. Additionally, we illustrate three ways in which practitioners and scholars manage value complexity: \"working around,\" \"working against,\" and \"working with\" complexity. We consider the (dis)advantages of each of these strategies. We conclude that \"working with\" complexity is difficult in practice yet provides untapped potential to responsibly manage value conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251330999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251330999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for a rethinking of complexity in healthcare in terms of value complexity. Although widely adopted in healthcare, the positivist roots of complexity theory have thus far limited its applicability to understand the wicked nature of many healthcare challenges. We draw on a new pragmatist approach to contend that values are situated and embedded in practice, and demonstrate how values and practices co-develop in ways resembling complex systems. We employ this analytical lens in a secondary analysis of prior ethnographic and action research undertaken between 2010 and 2022 in the context of Dutch healthcare. These studies were conducted in the context of older person care and the (care) services for people with chronic diseases, disabilities, and mental illness. Based on our findings, we bring forward a layered conceptualization of value complexity. Additionally, we illustrate three ways in which practitioners and scholars manage value complexity: "working around," "working against," and "working with" complexity. We consider the (dis)advantages of each of these strategies. We conclude that "working with" complexity is difficult in practice yet provides untapped potential to responsibly manage value conflicts.

在医疗保健领域处理价值复杂性。
在本文中,我们主张从价值复杂性的角度重新思考医疗保健的复杂性。虽然在医疗保健中被广泛采用,但复杂性理论的实证主义根源迄今为止限制了它在理解许多医疗保健挑战的邪恶本质方面的适用性。我们利用一种新的实用主义方法来论证价值观是定位和嵌入在实践中的,并展示价值观和实践如何以类似于复杂系统的方式共同发展。我们在2010年至2022年期间在荷兰医疗保健背景下进行的先前人种学和行动研究的二次分析中采用了这种分析镜头。这些研究是在老年人护理和慢性病、残疾和精神疾病患者(护理)服务的背景下进行的。在此基础上,我们提出了价值复杂性的分层概念。另外,我们说明了实践者和学者管理价值复杂性的三种方式:“绕过”、“反对”和“处理”复杂性。我们考虑了每种策略的(非)优势。我们得出的结论是,“处理”复杂性在实践中是困难的,但它提供了未开发的潜力来负责任地管理价值冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信