The utilization of the concept of profession to understand social problems: sharing preliminary results from systematic review.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1515427
Angelique Wildschut, Nomkhosi A Mbatha, Tamlynne Meyer
{"title":"The utilization of the concept of profession to understand social problems: sharing preliminary results from systematic review.","authors":"Angelique Wildschut, Nomkhosi A Mbatha, Tamlynne Meyer","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2025.1515427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nature of work has experienced steady shifts that have accelerated over the last three decades, raising important sociological questions; for instance, what does this mean for individuals and groups, and their relation to society, markets and the political systems that contextualize attempts and opportunities for different forms of livelihood? The concept of profession has been a key construct for sociological analysis to understand, study and theorise the implications of such shifts in different countries, workplaces and even particular occupational groups. Studies of professions have thus contributed to knowledge in many ways, not only by highlighting the implications for individuals and groups within work contexts but also illustrating importantly how this relates or not to wider societal phenomena. However, there are strong contentions that because its function as a mechanism of social structure formation has weakened significantly over time, as a sociological category and construct, the concept of profession is no longer relevant in contemporary times. This paper shares preliminary results from a systematic review of literature on the application and conceptualisation of the term profession between 2022 and 2023 to start engaging with the question of whether it has exhausted its sociological relevance. The findings suggest firstly that while there has been an overall decline in the utilization of profession-related terms, a slight increase in the utilization of profession is apparent. Secondly, in the reviewed papers, limited engagement with the conceptual underpinning of the construct exists. Finally, while critical engagement with the concept is not always apparent, most papers recognize a clear link between social phenomena and the role of the profession/s toward maintaining or dismantling such challenges in society.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"10 ","pages":"1515427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1515427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of work has experienced steady shifts that have accelerated over the last three decades, raising important sociological questions; for instance, what does this mean for individuals and groups, and their relation to society, markets and the political systems that contextualize attempts and opportunities for different forms of livelihood? The concept of profession has been a key construct for sociological analysis to understand, study and theorise the implications of such shifts in different countries, workplaces and even particular occupational groups. Studies of professions have thus contributed to knowledge in many ways, not only by highlighting the implications for individuals and groups within work contexts but also illustrating importantly how this relates or not to wider societal phenomena. However, there are strong contentions that because its function as a mechanism of social structure formation has weakened significantly over time, as a sociological category and construct, the concept of profession is no longer relevant in contemporary times. This paper shares preliminary results from a systematic review of literature on the application and conceptualisation of the term profession between 2022 and 2023 to start engaging with the question of whether it has exhausted its sociological relevance. The findings suggest firstly that while there has been an overall decline in the utilization of profession-related terms, a slight increase in the utilization of profession is apparent. Secondly, in the reviewed papers, limited engagement with the conceptual underpinning of the construct exists. Finally, while critical engagement with the concept is not always apparent, most papers recognize a clear link between social phenomena and the role of the profession/s toward maintaining or dismantling such challenges in society.

运用专业概念理解社会问题:分享系统回顾的初步结果。
在过去的三十年里,工作的性质经历了稳步的转变,这种转变加速了,引发了重要的社会学问题;例如,这对个人和群体意味着什么,以及他们与社会、市场和政治制度的关系意味着什么,这些制度为不同形式的生计提供了尝试和机会?职业概念一直是社会学分析理解、研究和理论化这种变化在不同国家、工作场所甚至特定职业群体中的影响的关键结构。因此,对职业的研究在许多方面对知识做出了贡献,不仅突出了对工作环境中个人和群体的影响,而且重要地说明了这与更广泛的社会现象之间的关系。然而,由于其作为社会结构形成机制的功能随着时间的推移而显着减弱,因此作为社会学范畴和结构的职业概念在当代已不再具有相关性。本文分享了对2022年至2023年期间“专业”一词的应用和概念化的文献进行系统回顾的初步结果,以开始讨论它是否已经耗尽其社会学相关性的问题。调查结果首先表明,虽然专业相关术语的使用总体上有所下降,但专业术语的使用明显略有增加。其次,在审查的论文中,有限的参与概念基础的结构存在。最后,虽然对这一概念的批判性参与并不总是很明显,但大多数论文都认识到社会现象与专业在维持或消除社会挑战方面的作用之间存在明确的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信