Intentional delivery versus expectant management in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes at 28-34 weeks of gestation - A prospective observational study.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1177/19345798251330832
Srishty Mohanty, Sibananda Nayak, Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda, Debasish Nanda
{"title":"Intentional delivery versus expectant management in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes at 28-34 weeks of gestation - A prospective observational study.","authors":"Srishty Mohanty, Sibananda Nayak, Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda, Debasish Nanda","doi":"10.1177/19345798251330832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPreterm prelabour rupture of membrane (PPROM) often precedes a significant number of preterm deliveries. However, the optimal timing of delivery in women with PPROM remains unclear.ObjectiveTo compare duration of neonatal intensive care between two management strategies - intentional delivery and expectant delivery, in women with PPROM between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation. Additionally, we also compared other crucial neonatal and maternal outcomes between the two groups.Materials/methodThis prospective observational study enrolled women aged over 18 years; singleton pregnancy complicated by PPROM occurring between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation. These women were managed either by intentional delivery (ID) or expectant management (ED), as per clinician discretion.ResultA total of 115 women were included in the study; 68 women underwent intentional delivery and 47 women by expectant management. Neonates born to mothers in the ID group had a significantly shorter hospital stay compared to those in the ED group (12.71 ± 13.89 vs. 20.02 ± 20.94, Mean difference 7.3 days, 95% CI: -0.9 to -13.7 days, <i>p</i> 0.026). The early onset neonatal sepsis was similar [11 (16.2%) in the ID group and 9 (19.1%) in the ED group, <i>p</i> 0.688 and other neonatal and maternal outcomes were also comparable between the two groups.ConclusionIn intentional management, the duration of neonatal hospital stay was shorter in comparison to the expectant management group, while there was no difference in other maternal and major neonatal outcomes. There was a clinician preference for expectant delivery with lower foetal weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"344-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251330832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPreterm prelabour rupture of membrane (PPROM) often precedes a significant number of preterm deliveries. However, the optimal timing of delivery in women with PPROM remains unclear.ObjectiveTo compare duration of neonatal intensive care between two management strategies - intentional delivery and expectant delivery, in women with PPROM between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation. Additionally, we also compared other crucial neonatal and maternal outcomes between the two groups.Materials/methodThis prospective observational study enrolled women aged over 18 years; singleton pregnancy complicated by PPROM occurring between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation. These women were managed either by intentional delivery (ID) or expectant management (ED), as per clinician discretion.ResultA total of 115 women were included in the study; 68 women underwent intentional delivery and 47 women by expectant management. Neonates born to mothers in the ID group had a significantly shorter hospital stay compared to those in the ED group (12.71 ± 13.89 vs. 20.02 ± 20.94, Mean difference 7.3 days, 95% CI: -0.9 to -13.7 days, p 0.026). The early onset neonatal sepsis was similar [11 (16.2%) in the ID group and 9 (19.1%) in the ED group, p 0.688 and other neonatal and maternal outcomes were also comparable between the two groups.ConclusionIn intentional management, the duration of neonatal hospital stay was shorter in comparison to the expectant management group, while there was no difference in other maternal and major neonatal outcomes. There was a clinician preference for expectant delivery with lower foetal weight.

有意分娩与妊娠28-34周早产胎膜破裂的预期治疗——一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:产前胎膜破裂(PPROM)通常是大量早产的前兆。然而,PPROM妇女的最佳分娩时间仍不清楚。目的比较妊娠28 ~ 34周PPROM患者有意分娩和期待分娩两种治疗策略对新生儿重症监护时间的影响。此外,我们还比较了两组之间其他关键的新生儿和产妇结局。材料/方法本前瞻性观察性研究纳入18岁以上的女性;单胎妊娠并发PPROM,发生在妊娠28至34周之间。根据临床医生的判断,这些妇女通过有意分娩(ID)或预期分娩(ED)进行管理。结果本研究共纳入115例产妇,其中有意分娩68例,待产47例。与ED组相比,ID组新生儿住院时间明显缩短(12.71±13.89 vs 20.02±20.94,平均差7.3天,95% CI: -0.9 ~ -13.7天,p 0.026)。早发性新生儿脓毒症发生率相似[ID组11例(16.2%),ED组9例(19.1%),p < 0.688],两组新生儿及产妇其他结局也具有可比性。结论有意管理组新生儿住院时间较期待管理组短,而其他孕产妇及新生儿主要结局无差异。临床医生倾向于低体重孕妇分娩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信