Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy With Intracorporeal Anastomosis-Eliminating the Painful 12 mm Port Paradox.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-11 DOI:10.1177/00031348251341963
Eduardo Alvarez, Adeel Ashfaq, Jocelyn Di Nolfi, Nathan Aminpour, Motahar Basam, Vikram Attaluri, Elisabeth C McLemore
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy With Intracorporeal Anastomosis-Eliminating the Painful 12 mm Port Paradox.","authors":"Eduardo Alvarez, Adeel Ashfaq, Jocelyn Di Nolfi, Nathan Aminpour, Motahar Basam, Vikram Attaluri, Elisabeth C McLemore","doi":"10.1177/00031348251341963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMinimally invasive right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) with relocation of the 12 mm port to the Pfannenstiel specimen incision is associated with reduced length of stay and postoperative ileus while preserving surgical and oncologic outcomes when compared to extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA).MethodsAn institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective review was conducted at a single center for all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic right hemicolectomy from 2015 to 2023. The 12 mm port for anastomosis stapler was placed in the planned Pfannenstiel specimen extraction site in all patients undergoing ICA.Results112 patients underwent minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (33 laparoscopic ECA, 1 robotic ECA, 51 laparoscopic ICA, 27 robotic ICA). Median operative times for ECA vs ICA were 149.8 and 183.1 minutes, respectively (<i>P</i> < .01). The median length of stay was shorter for ICA (2 vs 3 days, <i>P</i> < .01). Postoperative ileus was greater in the ECA group (8.8% vs 2.6%, <i>P</i> = .140). Hospital readmissions were higher in the ECA group (3 vs 1, <i>P</i> = .048). The rate of no evidence of disease at time of last oncology follow-up was in the ECA group (93.6%) vs in the ICA group (98.5%), <i>P</i> = .092. Recurrence rate was not significantly different when comparing the ECA group vs the ICA group (6.45% vs 4.55%, <i>P</i> = .708).DiscussionMinimally invasive right hemicolectomy with ICA is associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus and shorter length of stay. Relocating the 12-mm port for the bowel stapler to the Pfannenstiel extraction site eliminates the painful 12-mm port paradox.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1635-1642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251341963","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMinimally invasive right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) with relocation of the 12 mm port to the Pfannenstiel specimen incision is associated with reduced length of stay and postoperative ileus while preserving surgical and oncologic outcomes when compared to extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA).MethodsAn institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective review was conducted at a single center for all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic right hemicolectomy from 2015 to 2023. The 12 mm port for anastomosis stapler was placed in the planned Pfannenstiel specimen extraction site in all patients undergoing ICA.Results112 patients underwent minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (33 laparoscopic ECA, 1 robotic ECA, 51 laparoscopic ICA, 27 robotic ICA). Median operative times for ECA vs ICA were 149.8 and 183.1 minutes, respectively (P < .01). The median length of stay was shorter for ICA (2 vs 3 days, P < .01). Postoperative ileus was greater in the ECA group (8.8% vs 2.6%, P = .140). Hospital readmissions were higher in the ECA group (3 vs 1, P = .048). The rate of no evidence of disease at time of last oncology follow-up was in the ECA group (93.6%) vs in the ICA group (98.5%), P = .092. Recurrence rate was not significantly different when comparing the ECA group vs the ICA group (6.45% vs 4.55%, P = .708).DiscussionMinimally invasive right hemicolectomy with ICA is associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus and shorter length of stay. Relocating the 12-mm port for the bowel stapler to the Pfannenstiel extraction site eliminates the painful 12-mm port paradox.

微创右半结肠切除术与体内吻合-消除痛苦的12毫米端口悖论。
背景:与体外吻合(ECA)相比,微创右半结肠切除术与体内吻合(ICA)相比,将12mm端口重新定位到Pfannenstiel标本切口可缩短住院时间和术后肠梗阻,同时保留手术和肿瘤预后。方法对2015年至2023年接受择期腹腔镜或机器人右半结肠切除术的患者在单中心进行一项机构审查委员会批准的回顾性审查。在所有行ICA的患者中,吻合吻合器的12mm端口放置在计划的Pfannenstiel标本提取部位。结果112例患者行微创右半结肠切除术(腹腔镜内镜下ECA 33例,机器人内镜下ECA 1例,腹腔镜下ICA 51例,机器人内镜下ICA 27例)。ECA组和ICA组的中位手术时间分别为149.8分钟和183.1分钟(P < 0.01)。ICA的中位住院时间较短(2天vs 3天,P < 0.01)。ECA组术后肠梗阻发生率更高(8.8% vs 2.6%, P = 0.140)。ECA组再入院率较高(3 vs 1, P = 0.048)。在最后一次肿瘤随访时,ECA组无疾病证据的比率为93.6%,而ICA组为98.5%,P = 0.092。ECA组与ICA组复发率差异无统计学意义(6.45% vs 4.55%, P = 0.708)。微创右半结肠切除术联合ICA可降低术后肠梗阻发生率和缩短住院时间。将肠吻合器的12mm端口重新定位到Pfannenstiel提取部位,消除了痛苦的12mm端口悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信