[Bladder sparing options for muscle invasive high risk bladder cancer].

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Oliver Hahn, Hubert Kübler
{"title":"[Bladder sparing options for muscle invasive high risk bladder cancer].","authors":"Oliver Hahn, Hubert Kübler","doi":"10.1055/a-2586-5554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radical cystectomy is not a suitable option for every patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Whereas radiotherapy (in combination with radio-sensitizing chemotherapy) is mentioned as an alternative in the current German S3 guideline, numbers are low in Germany compared to other countries. We try here to sum up the current evidence and data, especially regarding the definition of on optimal patient population to profit from this kind of therapy. Furthermore, we take a look at the role of cystectomy in the age of modern tumour therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7513,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2586-5554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radical cystectomy is not a suitable option for every patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Whereas radiotherapy (in combination with radio-sensitizing chemotherapy) is mentioned as an alternative in the current German S3 guideline, numbers are low in Germany compared to other countries. We try here to sum up the current evidence and data, especially regarding the definition of on optimal patient population to profit from this kind of therapy. Furthermore, we take a look at the role of cystectomy in the age of modern tumour therapy.

[肌肉浸润性高风险膀胱癌的膀胱保留选择]。
根治性膀胱切除术并非适合所有肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者。虽然在目前的德国S3指南中提到了放疗(与放射线致敏化疗联合)作为一种替代方法,但与其他国家相比,德国的数字较低。我们试图在这里总结目前的证据和数据,特别是关于从这种治疗中获益的最佳患者群体的定义。此外,我们看一下膀胱切除术在现代肿瘤治疗时代的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aktuelle Urologie
Aktuelle Urologie 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung – für Sie auf den Punkt zusammengefasst und kritisch kommentiert Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis Auf dem Laufenden über die klinische Forschung durch interessante Originalien CME-Punkte sammeln mit der Rubrik "Operative Techniken" In jeder Ausgabe: Techniken wichtiger Standard-OPs – Schritt für Schritt Erstklassige OP-Skizzen mit verständlichen Erläuterungen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信