The efficacy of intraovarian versus subcutaneous corifollitropin alfa administration in DuoStim protocol for infertile women with low in vitro fertilization response

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fatemeh Keikha, Firoozeh Rakhshani Moghadam, Seyedeh Shahed Shoarishoar, Azadeh Tarafdari, Marjan Ghaemi
{"title":"The efficacy of intraovarian versus subcutaneous corifollitropin alfa administration in DuoStim protocol for infertile women with low in vitro fertilization response","authors":"Fatemeh Keikha,&nbsp;Firoozeh Rakhshani Moghadam,&nbsp;Seyedeh Shahed Shoarishoar,&nbsp;Azadeh Tarafdari,&nbsp;Marjan Ghaemi","doi":"10.1111/jog.16316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Infertility in women, particularly those with a poor response to in vitro fertilization (IVF), poses significant challenges in reproductive medicine. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intraovarian versus subcutaneous injection of corifollitropin alfa in the DuoStim protocol among infertile women exhibiting a poor response to IVF, with a specific focus on oocyte retrieval counts and quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 40 poorly responding infertile women were randomly assigned to two groups: 20 women received corifollitropin alfa via intraovarian injection, and 20 women received it via subcutaneous injection. Key demographic data, cycle duration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved, and oocyte quality (specifically Grade B oocytes) were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Demographic analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age (subcutaneous: 37.91 ± 6.11 years; intraovarian: 36.84 ± 5.42 years; <i>p</i> = 0.17) or weight (subcutaneous: 74.15 ± 10.51 kg; intraovarian: 78.24 ± 13.22 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.42). The number of oocytes retrieved during both phases did not significantly differ, but the intraovarian group yielded a notably higher number of Grade B oocytes during the follicular phase (<i>p</i> = 0.02). No significant differences were observed in cycle duration (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) or the final dose of gonadotropins administered (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study revealed that intraovarian injection of corifollitropin alfa may enhance the quality of oocytes retrieved, particularly Grade B oocytes, in women with poor response to IVF under the DuoStim protocol, while both methods exhibited similar outcomes in terms of demographic factors, cycle duration, and gonadotropin dosage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

Infertility in women, particularly those with a poor response to in vitro fertilization (IVF), poses significant challenges in reproductive medicine. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intraovarian versus subcutaneous injection of corifollitropin alfa in the DuoStim protocol among infertile women exhibiting a poor response to IVF, with a specific focus on oocyte retrieval counts and quality.

Materials and Methods

A total of 40 poorly responding infertile women were randomly assigned to two groups: 20 women received corifollitropin alfa via intraovarian injection, and 20 women received it via subcutaneous injection. Key demographic data, cycle duration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved, and oocyte quality (specifically Grade B oocytes) were assessed.

Results

Demographic analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age (subcutaneous: 37.91 ± 6.11 years; intraovarian: 36.84 ± 5.42 years; p = 0.17) or weight (subcutaneous: 74.15 ± 10.51 kg; intraovarian: 78.24 ± 13.22 kg; p = 0.42). The number of oocytes retrieved during both phases did not significantly differ, but the intraovarian group yielded a notably higher number of Grade B oocytes during the follicular phase (p = 0.02). No significant differences were observed in cycle duration (p > 0.05) or the final dose of gonadotropins administered (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The study revealed that intraovarian injection of corifollitropin alfa may enhance the quality of oocytes retrieved, particularly Grade B oocytes, in women with poor response to IVF under the DuoStim protocol, while both methods exhibited similar outcomes in terms of demographic factors, cycle duration, and gonadotropin dosage.

体外受精反应低的不孕症妇女的十二指肠方案中卵巢内与皮下给药的效果
背景和目的妇女不孕症,特别是那些对体外受精(IVF)反应不佳的妇女,对生殖医学提出了重大挑战。本研究的目的是比较卵巢内注射和皮下注射高叶酸蛋白在十二指肠方案中对体外受精反应不佳的不孕妇女的有效性,并特别关注卵母细胞回收计数和质量。材料与方法将40例反应不良的不孕症患者随机分为两组:20例经卵巢内注射,20例经皮下注射。评估关键人口统计学数据、周期持续时间、促性腺激素剂量、回收卵母细胞数量和卵母细胞质量(特别是B级卵母细胞)。结果人口统计学分析显示,两组患者年龄差异无统计学意义(皮下:37.91±6.11岁;卵巢内:36.84±5.42岁;P = 0.17)或体重(皮下:74.15±10.51 kg;卵巢内:78.24±13.22 kg;p = 0.42)。在两个阶段获得的卵母细胞数量没有显著差异,但卵巢内组在卵泡期获得的B级卵母细胞数量显著增加(p = 0.02)。在周期持续时间(p > 0.05)和促性腺激素的最终剂量(p > 0.05)方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:本研究显示,在十二指肠方案下,卵巢内注射corifolitropin α可提高体外受精反应较差的妇女获得的卵母细胞质量,特别是B级卵母细胞,而两种方法在人口统计学因素、周期持续时间和促性腺激素剂量方面的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信