Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hamza Ashraf, Zain Ali Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Shanzay Akhtar, Haider Ashfaq, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Mahad Butt, Ibrahim Nagmeldin, Eeshal Fatima, Muhammad Waqas, Aalaa Saleh, Hritvik Jain, Raheel Ahmed
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Hamza Ashraf,&nbsp;Zain Ali Nadeem,&nbsp;Khawaja Abdul Rehman,&nbsp;Shanzay Akhtar,&nbsp;Haider Ashfaq,&nbsp;Muhammad Sohaib Khan,&nbsp;Mahad Butt,&nbsp;Ibrahim Nagmeldin,&nbsp;Eeshal Fatima,&nbsp;Muhammad Waqas,&nbsp;Aalaa Saleh,&nbsp;Hritvik Jain,&nbsp;Raheel Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/clc.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection requiring prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) has emerged as an alternative to prolonged hospitalization, but its safety and efficacy in IE remain debated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of OPAT in IE patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies assessing OPAT in IE. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting at least one relevant outcome (mortality, relapse, readmission, valve surgery, and adverse events). Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 25 studies involving 2654 patients were included in the analysis. Patients treated with OPAT had a mortality rate of 0% during the treatment period and 5% during follow-up. The readmission rate was 16% during the treatment period, 4% of the patients had relapse, while 16% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. During follow-up, the readmission rate was 19%, with a relapse rate of 2%, and 14% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results, highlighting the robustness of the findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>OPAT appears to be safe and effective for IE patients, with low mortality and relapse rates. However, increased readmission rates and IV-line complications warrant careful patient selection and monitoring. Further prospective trials are needed to refine OPAT protocols.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70147","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection requiring prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) has emerged as an alternative to prolonged hospitalization, but its safety and efficacy in IE remain debated.

Hypothesis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of OPAT in IE patients.

Methods

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies assessing OPAT in IE. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting at least one relevant outcome (mortality, relapse, readmission, valve surgery, and adverse events). Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool.

Results

A total of 25 studies involving 2654 patients were included in the analysis. Patients treated with OPAT had a mortality rate of 0% during the treatment period and 5% during follow-up. The readmission rate was 16% during the treatment period, 4% of the patients had relapse, while 16% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. During follow-up, the readmission rate was 19%, with a relapse rate of 2%, and 14% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect the results, highlighting the robustness of the findings.

Conclusion

OPAT appears to be safe and effective for IE patients, with low mortality and relapse rates. However, increased readmission rates and IV-line complications warrant careful patient selection and monitoring. Further prospective trials are needed to refine OPAT protocols.

感染性心内膜炎患者门诊肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:感染性心内膜炎(IE)是一种危及生命的感染,需要长时间的静脉抗菌治疗。门诊肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)已成为长期住院治疗的替代方案,但其在IE中的安全性和有效性仍存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估OPAT治疗IE患者的结果。方法系统地检索MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、谷歌Scholar和Scopus,检索评估IE中OPAT的研究。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验和报告至少一项相关结果(死亡率、复发、再入院、瓣膜手术和不良事件)的观察性研究。使用随机效应模型计算合并估计,使用I²统计量评估异质性。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。结果共纳入25项研究,涉及2654例患者。接受OPAT治疗的患者治疗期间死亡率为0%,随访期间死亡率为5%。治疗期间再入院率为16%,4%的患者复发,16%的患者接受了心脏手术。随访期间,再入院率为19%,复发率为2%,14%的患者接受了心脏手术。敏感性分析没有显著影响结果,突出了研究结果的稳健性。结论OPAT治疗IE患者安全有效,死亡率低,复发率低。然而,增加的再入院率和iv线并发症需要仔细选择和监测患者。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来完善OPAT方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信