Canadians' Gentle Shift of Opinions on Privacy: An Assessment of Public Values

IF 1.1 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Geneviève Morin, Étienne Charbonneau, Daniel E. Bromberg
{"title":"Canadians' Gentle Shift of Opinions on Privacy: An Assessment of Public Values","authors":"Geneviève Morin,&nbsp;Étienne Charbonneau,&nbsp;Daniel E. Bromberg","doi":"10.1111/capa.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Privacy is seldom regarded as a public value or subjected to empirical analysis in public administration. This study parsed 35 empirical research studies on privacy—encompassing more than 47 000 respondents—which were retrieved from Canada's <i>Public Opinion Research Archives</i> between 2007 and 2024. These government-sponsored studies were analyzed by the types of encounters, theoretical relationships, and citizen public value assessment. For Canadians, privacy is especially salient for state-initiated exchanges with citizens. It is thought of as a context more than as a cause or an outcome. It qualifies as a value, in tension with others, rather than as consensus or a contested value.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"68 1","pages":"41-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Privacy is seldom regarded as a public value or subjected to empirical analysis in public administration. This study parsed 35 empirical research studies on privacy—encompassing more than 47 000 respondents—which were retrieved from Canada's Public Opinion Research Archives between 2007 and 2024. These government-sponsored studies were analyzed by the types of encounters, theoretical relationships, and citizen public value assessment. For Canadians, privacy is especially salient for state-initiated exchanges with citizens. It is thought of as a context more than as a cause or an outcome. It qualifies as a value, in tension with others, rather than as consensus or a contested value.

加拿大人对隐私观念的温和转变:对公共价值观的评估
在公共管理中,隐私很少被视为一种公共价值,也很少受到实证分析。这项研究分析了35项关于隐私的实证研究,涵盖了47000多名受访者,这些研究来自2007年至2024年加拿大民意研究档案。这些政府资助的研究通过接触类型、理论关系和公民公共价值评估进行了分析。对加拿大人来说,在政府发起的与公民的交流中,隐私问题尤为突出。它被认为是一个背景,而不是一个原因或结果。它有资格作为一种价值观,在与他人的紧张关系中,而不是作为共识或有争议的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信