How does the three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) impact farmers’ sense of gain: Evidence from typical pilot areas for rural homestead reform in China

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zhaolin Wang , Yingying Wang , Guohua Bi
{"title":"How does the three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) impact farmers’ sense of gain: Evidence from typical pilot areas for rural homestead reform in China","authors":"Zhaolin Wang ,&nbsp;Yingying Wang ,&nbsp;Guohua Bi","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) in China represents a pivotal policy innovation aimed at facilitating the transfer of rural homesteads and fostering their efficient utilization. Here, we developed a conceptual framework and combined empirical investigation from China’s 10 pilot areas for rural homestead reform, using the Coupling Coordination Degree Model (CCDM) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences (PSM-DID) to examine how the implementation of the TRSRH impacts the farmers’ senses of gain. Our findings uncover that: i) The TRSRH significantly improves farmers’ senses of gain and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) of their senses of gain, this conclusion is still valid after a variety of robustness tests. ii) The impacts of the TRSRH on farmers’ multidimensional senses of gain exhibit significant differences. The policy has the strongest influence on their sense of economic gain and social security gain, followed by sense of social relationship gain, while its impact on their sense of production and life gain was comparatively weak. iii) The impacts of the TRSRH on the farmers’ sense of gain varies across locations. The most significant effects are observed in outer suburbs villages, while the impacts are weaker in suburban and remote villages. Additionally, the TRSRH might lead to farmers’ non-comprehensive development and exacerbate rural development imbalance across different locational villages. The findings can provide valuable insights for the formulation of the rural homestead reform policies in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 107591"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) in China represents a pivotal policy innovation aimed at facilitating the transfer of rural homesteads and fostering their efficient utilization. Here, we developed a conceptual framework and combined empirical investigation from China’s 10 pilot areas for rural homestead reform, using the Coupling Coordination Degree Model (CCDM) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences (PSM-DID) to examine how the implementation of the TRSRH impacts the farmers’ senses of gain. Our findings uncover that: i) The TRSRH significantly improves farmers’ senses of gain and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) of their senses of gain, this conclusion is still valid after a variety of robustness tests. ii) The impacts of the TRSRH on farmers’ multidimensional senses of gain exhibit significant differences. The policy has the strongest influence on their sense of economic gain and social security gain, followed by sense of social relationship gain, while its impact on their sense of production and life gain was comparatively weak. iii) The impacts of the TRSRH on the farmers’ sense of gain varies across locations. The most significant effects are observed in outer suburbs villages, while the impacts are weaker in suburban and remote villages. Additionally, the TRSRH might lead to farmers’ non-comprehensive development and exacerbate rural development imbalance across different locational villages. The findings can provide valuable insights for the formulation of the rural homestead reform policies in China.
农村宅基地三权分立对农民获得感的影响——来自中国典型农村宅基地改革试点地区的证据
中国农村宅基地三权分置制度是一项关键性的政策创新,旨在促进农村宅基地的流转和有效利用。在此,我们构建了一个概念框架,并结合中国10个农村宅基地改革试点地区的实证调查,利用耦合协调度模型(CCDM)和倾向得分匹配-差异中的差异(PSM-DID)来研究农村宅基地改革实施对农民获得感的影响。研究发现:1)TRSRH显著提高了农民的增益感和增益感的耦合协调度(CCD),经过各种稳健性检验,这一结论仍然成立。(2)农户多维获得感的影响存在显著差异。政策对经济获得感和社会保障获得感的影响最大,其次是社会关系获得感,而对生产生活获得感的影响相对较弱。(3)不同地区农民获得感受TRSRH影响的程度不同。影响最显著的是远郊村庄,而影响较弱的是近郊村庄和偏远村庄。此外,TRSRH可能导致农民的非综合发展,加剧不同位置村庄之间的农村发展不平衡。研究结果可为中国农村宅基地改革政策的制定提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信