Factors affecting solid waste separation behaviors at source among industrial staff: Structural equation modeling

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Shafiei-Alavijeh, N. Kaydi, S. Jorfi, N. Jaafarzadeh Haghighifard, A. Derakhshannejad, M. Araban
{"title":"Factors affecting solid waste separation behaviors at source among industrial staff: Structural equation modeling","authors":"A. Shafiei-Alavijeh,&nbsp;N. Kaydi,&nbsp;S. Jorfi,&nbsp;N. Jaafarzadeh Haghighifard,&nbsp;A. Derakhshannejad,&nbsp;M. Araban","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06194-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid development of industrial practices has made it necessary to identify factors affecting solid waste source separation behaviors among industrial staff. To this aim, this cross-sectional study was conducted on 301 participants from 4 industrial factories in Ahvaz, Iran in 2022. To collect the data, a valid and reliable questionnaire which involved 12 constructs based on Extended Parallel Process Model was used. Data were analyzed using Statistical package for social sciences version 26 and intelligent partial least squares-structural equation modeling to identify the relationship between variables. The extensive statistical model showed two types of paths related to solid waste separation at source, namely adaptive and maladaptive process paths. Results revealed significant relationships for adaptive response paths, including <i>susceptibility→perceived severity</i> (β=0.809, t=26.934), <i>susceptibility→response efficacy</i> (β=0.537, t=6.921), <i>response efficacy→self-efficacy</i> (β=0.164, t=3.364), and <i>perceived severity→self-efficacy</i> (β=0.447, t=6.591). There were relationships between <i>response efficacy→attitude</i> (β=0.449, t=6.289), and <i>self-efficacy→intention</i> (β=0.523, t=10.183). Results for maladaptive paths revealed positive and significant relationships between <i>defensive avoidance→message minimization</i> (β=0.415, t=6.883) and <i>minimization→manipulation</i> (β=0.781, t=24.023). The average variance extracted was 0.704, and the composite reliability average was above the threshold level of 0.7. The present study revealed that the model extracted in this study has new dimensions compared to the initial Extended Parallel Process Model and could predict factors related to solid waste management among the staff of industrial factories. Intention was the most influential path in predicting waste management behavior. The proposed models could serve as a framework for environmental-friendly programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 9","pages":"7601 - 7624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06194-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of industrial practices has made it necessary to identify factors affecting solid waste source separation behaviors among industrial staff. To this aim, this cross-sectional study was conducted on 301 participants from 4 industrial factories in Ahvaz, Iran in 2022. To collect the data, a valid and reliable questionnaire which involved 12 constructs based on Extended Parallel Process Model was used. Data were analyzed using Statistical package for social sciences version 26 and intelligent partial least squares-structural equation modeling to identify the relationship between variables. The extensive statistical model showed two types of paths related to solid waste separation at source, namely adaptive and maladaptive process paths. Results revealed significant relationships for adaptive response paths, including susceptibility→perceived severity (β=0.809, t=26.934), susceptibility→response efficacy (β=0.537, t=6.921), response efficacy→self-efficacy (β=0.164, t=3.364), and perceived severity→self-efficacy (β=0.447, t=6.591). There were relationships between response efficacy→attitude (β=0.449, t=6.289), and self-efficacy→intention (β=0.523, t=10.183). Results for maladaptive paths revealed positive and significant relationships between defensive avoidance→message minimization (β=0.415, t=6.883) and minimization→manipulation (β=0.781, t=24.023). The average variance extracted was 0.704, and the composite reliability average was above the threshold level of 0.7. The present study revealed that the model extracted in this study has new dimensions compared to the initial Extended Parallel Process Model and could predict factors related to solid waste management among the staff of industrial factories. Intention was the most influential path in predicting waste management behavior. The proposed models could serve as a framework for environmental-friendly programs.

影响工业人员固体废物源头分类行为的因素:结构方程模型
工业实践的快速发展使得有必要确定影响工业人员固体废物源分类行为的因素。为此,本横断面研究于2022年对来自伊朗阿瓦士4家工业工厂的301名参与者进行了研究。为了收集数据,采用了一份有效可靠的问卷调查,该问卷调查基于扩展并行过程模型,涉及12个构念。使用Statistical package for social sciences version 26和智能偏最小二乘-结构方程模型对数据进行分析,以确定变量之间的关系。广泛的统计模型显示了两种与固体废物源头分离相关的路径,即自适应和非自适应过程路径。结果表明:易感→感知严重程度(β=0.809, t=26.934)、易感→反应效果(β=0.537, t=6.921)、反应效果→自我效能(β=0.164, t=3.364)、感知严重程度→自我效能(β=0.447, t=6.591)的适应性反应路径呈显著相关。反应效能→态度(β=0.449, t=6.289)、自我效能→意向(β=0.523, t=10.183)之间存在相关关系。结果显示,防御回避→信息最小化(β=0.415, t=6.883)与最小化→操纵(β=0.781, t=24.023)之间存在显著正相关。提取的平均方差为0.704,复合信度平均值高于0.7的阈值水平。本研究发现,与最初的扩展平行过程模型相比,本研究提取的模型具有新的维度,可以预测工业工厂员工固体废物管理的相关因素。意向是预测废物管理行为最具影响力的途径。提出的模型可以作为环境友好型项目的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信