Shared-care management standards of palliative care in Chinese adults: A Delphi study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Junchen Guo , Linghao Zeng , Yunyun Dai , Xianghua Xu , Yonghong Hu , Yongyi Chen
{"title":"Shared-care management standards of palliative care in Chinese adults: A Delphi study","authors":"Junchen Guo ,&nbsp;Linghao Zeng ,&nbsp;Yunyun Dai ,&nbsp;Xianghua Xu ,&nbsp;Yonghong Hu ,&nbsp;Yongyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score &gt; 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores &lt; 0.25 were retained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.001), indicating consensus among the experts. At the end of the second round, the average importance score of each item was 4.73–5.00. A total of 8 modules including SCM team, applicable population, process of SCM, contents of SCM, start time, precautions, effectiveness evaluation and quality control, and the corresponding 22 items were finally identified in this standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525000502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China.

Methods

Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score > 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores < 0.25 were retained.

Results

The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all P ​< ​0.001), indicating consensus among the experts. At the end of the second round, the average importance score of each item was 4.73–5.00. A total of 8 modules including SCM team, applicable population, process of SCM, contents of SCM, start time, precautions, effectiveness evaluation and quality control, and the corresponding 22 items were finally identified in this standard.

Conclusions

The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.
中国成人姑息治疗共享医疗管理标准:德尔菲研究
目的姑息治疗中的共享医疗管理(SCM)是一种协作模式,共享医疗团队与患者原来的医疗服务提供者合作,采用包括会诊和协调转诊在内的多模式策略来提高患者的护理质量。关于其实施的证据仍然支离破碎,缺乏详细的解释,这阻碍了其在临床实践中的应用。本研究旨在建立中国大陆地区成人姑息治疗的SCM标准。方法通过文献证据总结,初步确定标准框架。从2024年4月到8月,进行了两轮德尔菲法,目的是修改标准。为了建立共识,具有平均重要性得分的项目>;3.50和项目得分变异系数<;保留0.25个。结果第一轮有35名专家参与,第二轮有33名专家参与。两轮专家咨询的肯德尔一致性系数分别为0.128和0.134(均P <;0.001),表明专家之间的共识。在第二轮结束时,每个项目的平均重要性得分为4.73-5.00。本标准最终确定了SCM团队、适用人群、SCM过程、SCM内容、启动时间、注意事项、有效性评价和质量控制等8个模块,共22个项目。结论本研究标准的建立为医疗机构提供了一个重要的框架,以确保供应链管理服务在中国大陆地区的统一和有效提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信