The logistics trade-off between D&D and warehousing costs

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Katrien Storms, Thierry Vanelslander, Edwin van Hassel
{"title":"The logistics trade-off between D&D and warehousing costs","authors":"Katrien Storms,&nbsp;Thierry Vanelslander,&nbsp;Edwin van Hassel","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyses the impact of container demurrage and detention (D&amp;D) on the total logistics costs (TLC) of a shipper. More specifically, it looks into how these costs influence the decision to store cargo in a container throughout the hinterland chain or in a warehouse. To do this, a case study with company-specific data is implemented. The findings show, first of all, that the lead time plays an important role in whether D&amp;D occurs. Longer lead times exceeding the D&amp;D free time result in D&amp;D costs which increase the shippers’ TLC considerably. Second, the impact of D&amp;D on the TLC is shipping line dependent. Hence, shippers can limit the TLC increase by choosing shipping lines that offer more free time for intermodal transport. Third, increases in the warehousing cost component can result in higher TLC compared to the TLC when D&amp;D charges occur, suggesting that it might become more interesting for the shipper to store its goods in the container throughout the hinterland chain and thus pay D&amp;D instead of in a warehouse. These results, although case-dependent, give insights into alternative storage options throughout the chain and their costs for shippers as well as that incurring D&amp;D charges can be acceptable under certain logistics strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the impact of container demurrage and detention (D&D) on the total logistics costs (TLC) of a shipper. More specifically, it looks into how these costs influence the decision to store cargo in a container throughout the hinterland chain or in a warehouse. To do this, a case study with company-specific data is implemented. The findings show, first of all, that the lead time plays an important role in whether D&D occurs. Longer lead times exceeding the D&D free time result in D&D costs which increase the shippers’ TLC considerably. Second, the impact of D&D on the TLC is shipping line dependent. Hence, shippers can limit the TLC increase by choosing shipping lines that offer more free time for intermodal transport. Third, increases in the warehousing cost component can result in higher TLC compared to the TLC when D&D charges occur, suggesting that it might become more interesting for the shipper to store its goods in the container throughout the hinterland chain and thus pay D&D instead of in a warehouse. These results, although case-dependent, give insights into alternative storage options throughout the chain and their costs for shippers as well as that incurring D&D charges can be acceptable under certain logistics strategies.
配送和拆卸成本与仓储成本之间的物流权衡
本研究分析了集装箱滞期费和滞留对托运人总物流成本的影响。更具体地说,它研究了这些成本如何影响将货物存储在整个腹地链的集装箱或仓库中的决定。为此,实现了一个带有公司特定数据的案例研究。研究结果表明,首先,前置时间在是否发生D&;D方面起着重要作用。较长的交货时间超过了d&&d空闲时间,导致d&&d成本,这大大增加了托运人的TLC。其次,D&;D对TLC的影响依赖于航运公司。因此,托运人可以通过选择为多式联运提供更多自由时间的航运公司来限制TLC的增加。第三,仓储成本部分的增加可能导致TLC高于D&;D费用发生时的TLC,这表明托运人在整个腹地链中将货物存储在集装箱中,从而支付D&;D而不是在仓库中支付TLC,可能会变得更有趣。这些结果虽然取决于具体情况,但可以深入了解整个供应链的其他存储选项及其托运人的成本,以及在某些物流策略下产生的D&;D费用是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信