Exploring Bullshit in the Field of Medical Informatics: A Critical Perspective.

Matthias Bender, Murat Sariyar
{"title":"Exploring Bullshit in the Field of Medical Informatics: A Critical Perspective.","authors":"Matthias Bender, Murat Sariyar","doi":"10.3233/SHTI250069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical informatics continues to face significant challenges in establishing itself as a fully recognized scientific discipline. This lack of recognition can sometimes foster endeavors that, while appealing to uninformed audiences, may lack substantive scientific merit. This paper examines the concept of \"bullshit\" within the field, distinguishing between two forms: intentional misrepresentation (F-bullshit) and uncritical proliferation of assertions as truth (C-bullshit). By analyzing two case studies - the implementation of a national electronic health record (EHR) system in Switzerland and the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) - we demonstrate how these types of bullshit sometimes emerge in medical informatics. We argue that a thorough investigation into the epistemological foundations of the discipline is essential for clearly delineating authentic scientific progress from superficial or misleading representations that may only mimic scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"323 ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical informatics continues to face significant challenges in establishing itself as a fully recognized scientific discipline. This lack of recognition can sometimes foster endeavors that, while appealing to uninformed audiences, may lack substantive scientific merit. This paper examines the concept of "bullshit" within the field, distinguishing between two forms: intentional misrepresentation (F-bullshit) and uncritical proliferation of assertions as truth (C-bullshit). By analyzing two case studies - the implementation of a national electronic health record (EHR) system in Switzerland and the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) - we demonstrate how these types of bullshit sometimes emerge in medical informatics. We argue that a thorough investigation into the epistemological foundations of the discipline is essential for clearly delineating authentic scientific progress from superficial or misleading representations that may only mimic scientific rigor.

医学信息学要成为一门得到充分认可的科学学科,仍然面临着巨大的挑战。这种缺乏认可的情况有时会助长一些努力,这些努力虽然吸引了不明真相的受众,但可能缺乏实质性的科学价值。本文探讨了这一领域中 "胡说八道 "的概念,并区分了两种形式:故意歪曲事实(F-胡说八道)和不加区分地把断言当作真理(C-胡说八道)。通过分析两个案例研究--瑞士国家电子健康记录(EHR)系统的实施和患者报告结果(PROMs)的使用--我们展示了医学信息学中有时是如何出现这些类型的废话的。我们认为,对该学科的认识论基础进行彻底调查,对于明确划分真正的科学进步与肤浅或误导性的表述(可能只是模仿科学的严谨性)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信