Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Interlock Detachable Coil Interventional Embolization on Pelvic Congestion Syndrome and Ovarian Reserve Function: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S513288
Peng Wang, Xiang-Long Zheng, Yu-Huan Wang, Yun Tao, Wan-Chun Wang
{"title":"Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Interlock Detachable Coil Interventional Embolization on Pelvic Congestion Syndrome and Ovarian Reserve Function: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Peng Wang, Xiang-Long Zheng, Yu-Huan Wang, Yun Tao, Wan-Chun Wang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S513288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effects and the efficacy of a combination of interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy for Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients diagnosed with PCS, and divided them into three groups based on their therapeutic schedule. The visual analog scale (VAS), pelvic venous blood flow parameters, and serum hormone levels of the three groups were compared before and after treatment. Moreover, the clinical efficacy and long-term changes in ovarian reserve functions were analyzed. For the comparison of measurement data before and after treatment within the group, paired - sample <i>t</i> - test was used for analysis. For the comparison between groups, one - way analysis of variance was applied. A P - value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the study group had significantly lower pain degrees than in the control group I and the control group II at 24 h and the first month after the operation (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The degree of pain in patients in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group I at the third and 6 months following the treatment (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The parameters of venous blood flow and ovarian reserve in patients treated with the combined endocrine hormone therapy were significantly better than those in patients not treated with endocrine hormone therapy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of precise interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy can rapidly and effectively relieve pain in patients with PCS. Compared with free coil embolization, this combination can effectively increase vascular tension, reduce congestion, inhibit ovarian function, reduce pelvic congestion, and relieve symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"1945-1955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S513288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects and the efficacy of a combination of interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy for Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients diagnosed with PCS, and divided them into three groups based on their therapeutic schedule. The visual analog scale (VAS), pelvic venous blood flow parameters, and serum hormone levels of the three groups were compared before and after treatment. Moreover, the clinical efficacy and long-term changes in ovarian reserve functions were analyzed. For the comparison of measurement data before and after treatment within the group, paired - sample t - test was used for analysis. For the comparison between groups, one - way analysis of variance was applied. A P - value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results: Patients in the study group had significantly lower pain degrees than in the control group I and the control group II at 24 h and the first month after the operation (p < 0.05). The degree of pain in patients in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group I at the third and 6 months following the treatment (p < 0.05). The parameters of venous blood flow and ovarian reserve in patients treated with the combined endocrine hormone therapy were significantly better than those in patients not treated with endocrine hormone therapy (p < 0.05). The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A combination of precise interventional embolization and endocrine hormone therapy can rapidly and effectively relieve pain in patients with PCS. Compared with free coil embolization, this combination can effectively increase vascular tension, reduce congestion, inhibit ovarian function, reduce pelvic congestion, and relieve symptoms.

联锁可拆卸线圈介入栓塞治疗盆腔充血综合征及卵巢储备功能的临床疗效分析
目的:探讨介入栓塞联合内分泌激素治疗盆腔充血综合征(PCS)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析132例确诊为PCS的患者,根据治疗方案将其分为3组。比较三组患者治疗前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、盆腔静脉血流量参数及血清激素水平。并分析其临床疗效及卵巢储备功能的长期变化。组内治疗前后计量资料比较,采用配对样本t检验进行分析。组间比较采用单因素方差分析。P值小于0.05表示差异有统计学意义。结果:研究组患者术后24 h和术后1个月疼痛程度明显低于对照组I和对照组II,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。治疗后第3个月和第6个月,研究组患者疼痛程度明显低于对照组1 (p < 0.05)。联合内分泌激素治疗组静脉血流量及卵巢储备指标明显优于未联合内分泌激素治疗组(p < 0.05)。研究组总有效率显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论:精准介入栓塞配合内分泌激素治疗能快速有效地缓解PCS患者的疼痛。与自由线圈栓塞相比,该组合可有效增加血管张力,减少充血,抑制卵巢功能,减少盆腔充血,缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信