Translating, Adapting and Validating the Revised MISSCARE Survey for Use in Norwegian Hospitals-A Pilot Study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251332742
Kjersti Grønning, Melliane Muteba Olsen, Beate André
{"title":"Translating, Adapting and Validating the Revised MISSCARE Survey for Use in Norwegian Hospitals-A Pilot Study.","authors":"Kjersti Grønning, Melliane Muteba Olsen, Beate André","doi":"10.1177/23779608251332742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The original <i>MISSCARE Survey</i> was developed in the US in the early 2000s to assess the amount of missed nursing care. Because additional causes of missed care were detected in later years, the <i>MISSCARE Survey</i> was further developed in 2019 by adding one item in Part A and five items in Part B to the questionnaire. Neither the original nor the <i>revised MISSCARE Survey</i> is translated into Norwegian, so a questionnaire is needed to assess missed nursing care in Norway. This study aims to translate and adapt the revised <i>MISSCARE Survey</i> for use in Norwegian hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A forward translation, followed by an expert panel's back-translation, cognitive interviews, and final version testing were conducted. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to investigate the underlying factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed for a test-retest evaluation. IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29) was used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 nurses and nursing assistants took part in the study assessing the psychometric properties of the Norwegian adaptation of the revised <i>MISSCARE Survey</i>. The exploratory factor analysis for Part B revealed four factors, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.895, and Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.841 to 0.751, reflecting good internal consistency. The overall test-retest ICC was 0.894 for Part A and 0.827 for Part B, indicating strong reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised <i>MISSCARE Survey</i> adapted for use in Norwegian hospitals is a reliable and promising instrument for assessing missed nursing care in medical and surgical units within a local Norwegian hospital. However, further studies should be conducted to confirm the factor structure in larger and more diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251332742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251332742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The original MISSCARE Survey was developed in the US in the early 2000s to assess the amount of missed nursing care. Because additional causes of missed care were detected in later years, the MISSCARE Survey was further developed in 2019 by adding one item in Part A and five items in Part B to the questionnaire. Neither the original nor the revised MISSCARE Survey is translated into Norwegian, so a questionnaire is needed to assess missed nursing care in Norway. This study aims to translate and adapt the revised MISSCARE Survey for use in Norwegian hospitals.

Methods: A forward translation, followed by an expert panel's back-translation, cognitive interviews, and final version testing were conducted. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to investigate the underlying factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed for a test-retest evaluation. IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29) was used for all analyses.

Results: A total of 120 nurses and nursing assistants took part in the study assessing the psychometric properties of the Norwegian adaptation of the revised MISSCARE Survey. The exploratory factor analysis for Part B revealed four factors, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.895, and Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.841 to 0.751, reflecting good internal consistency. The overall test-retest ICC was 0.894 for Part A and 0.827 for Part B, indicating strong reliability.

Conclusions: The revised MISSCARE Survey adapted for use in Norwegian hospitals is a reliable and promising instrument for assessing missed nursing care in medical and surgical units within a local Norwegian hospital. However, further studies should be conducted to confirm the factor structure in larger and more diverse populations.

翻译、改编和验证挪威医院使用的 MISSCARE 调查修订版--一项试点研究。
背景:最初的MISSCARE调查是在21世纪初在美国开发的,用于评估错过护理的数量。由于在后来的几年中发现了更多遗漏护理的原因,因此在2019年进一步发展了MISSCARE调查,在问卷的A部分增加了一个项目,在B部分增加了五个项目。无论是原始的还是修订的MISSCARE调查都没有被翻译成挪威语,因此需要一份问卷来评估挪威的护理遗漏。本研究的目的是翻译和调整修订后的MISSCARE调查,以供挪威医院使用。方法:前向翻译,后向翻译,认知访谈,最终版本测试。探索性因子分析探讨了潜在的因素结构。采用Cronbach’s alpha评价内部一致性,采用类内相关系数(ICC)进行重测评价。使用IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29)进行所有分析。结果:共有120名护士和护理员参加了评估挪威人适应修订MISSCARE调查的心理测量特性的研究。对B部分进行探索性因子分析,发现了4个因子,抽样充分性的Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin测度为0.895,Cronbach’s alpha值在0.841 ~ 0.751之间,反映了较好的内部一致性。A部分总体重测ICC为0.894,B部分为0.827,信度较强。结论:修订后的MISSCARE调查适用于挪威医院,是评估挪威当地医院医疗和外科部门护理遗漏的可靠和有前途的工具。但是,还需要进一步的研究来确认更大、更多样化的人群中的因子结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信