Sleep, Daytime Symptoms, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Military Personnel with Comorbid Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Connie L Thomas, Vincent F Capaldi, Jacob Collen, Zhiwei Zhao, Scott G Williams, Samson Z Assefa, Shuo Chen, Jennifer S Albrecht, Emerson M Wickwire
{"title":"Sleep, Daytime Symptoms, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Military Personnel with Comorbid Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Connie L Thomas, Vincent F Capaldi, Jacob Collen, Zhiwei Zhao, Scott G Williams, Samson Z Assefa, Shuo Chen, Jennifer S Albrecht, Emerson M Wickwire","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA) are prevalent conditions with significant physical and mental health comorbidities. Our study sought to estimate the effect of COMISA vs. obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) alone on subjective and objective sleep, daytime symptoms including cognition, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among military service members (SMs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Military SMs (n = 201) completed research questionnaires and then an intensive 10-day remote monitoring assessment, including wearing a commercial sleep tracker, completing daily sleep diaries, and completing twice-daily symptom surveys via a mobile application. Subjective cognition was measured using 3 self-report items assessing memory, concentration, and executive function. Between-groups (COMISA vs. OSA) differences in subjective and objective sleep, daytime symptoms, and HCRU were examined using a series of one-way ANOVAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to participants with OSA alone (n = 98; 48.8%), participants with COMISA (n = 81; 40.3%) demonstrated poorer subjective sleep and daytime symptoms as measured by traditional questionnaires (i.e., Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index) and twice-daily symptom surveys, as well as increased HCRU. No between-groups differences were observed in objectively measured sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among military SMs and relative to OSA alone, COMISA was associated with worsened subjective but not objective sleep, worsened daytime symptoms including cognition, and greater HCRU.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA) are prevalent conditions with significant physical and mental health comorbidities. Our study sought to estimate the effect of COMISA vs. obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) alone on subjective and objective sleep, daytime symptoms including cognition, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among military service members (SMs).

Materials and methods: Military SMs (n = 201) completed research questionnaires and then an intensive 10-day remote monitoring assessment, including wearing a commercial sleep tracker, completing daily sleep diaries, and completing twice-daily symptom surveys via a mobile application. Subjective cognition was measured using 3 self-report items assessing memory, concentration, and executive function. Between-groups (COMISA vs. OSA) differences in subjective and objective sleep, daytime symptoms, and HCRU were examined using a series of one-way ANOVAs.

Results: Compared to participants with OSA alone (n = 98; 48.8%), participants with COMISA (n = 81; 40.3%) demonstrated poorer subjective sleep and daytime symptoms as measured by traditional questionnaires (i.e., Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index) and twice-daily symptom surveys, as well as increased HCRU. No between-groups differences were observed in objectively measured sleep.

Conclusions: Among military SMs and relative to OSA alone, COMISA was associated with worsened subjective but not objective sleep, worsened daytime symptoms including cognition, and greater HCRU.

伴有失眠和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的军人的睡眠、日间症状和保健资源利用
导言:合并失眠和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(COMISA)是一种普遍存在的疾病,具有严重的身心健康合并症。我们的研究旨在估算COMISA与单纯阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)对军人(SMs)主观和客观睡眠、包括认知在内的日间症状以及医疗资源利用率(HCRU)的影响:军人(n = 201)完成研究问卷,然后进行为期 10 天的密集远程监测评估,包括佩戴商用睡眠追踪器、完成每日睡眠日记以及通过移动应用程序完成每日两次的症状调查。主观认知采用 3 个自我报告项目进行测量,分别评估记忆力、注意力和执行功能。通过一系列单因素方差分析检验了组间(COMISA 与 OSA)主观和客观睡眠、日间症状和 HCRU 的差异:结果:与单纯 OSA 患者(98 人,占 48.8%)相比,COMISA 患者(81 人,占 40.3%)的主观睡眠和日间症状较差,以传统问卷(即埃普沃斯嗜睡量表和失眠严重程度指数)和每日两次症状调查来衡量,HCRU 也有所增加。在客观测量的睡眠方面没有观察到组间差异:结论:在军人 SM 中,相对于单纯的 OSA,COMISA 与主观但非客观睡眠恶化、包括认知在内的日间症状恶化以及 HCRU 增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信