European guidelines for the management of tuberculosis screening procedures in migrants: A systematic review.

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-12-31 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855
Marina Pinheiro, Carolina Valente, Margarida Cruz, David Nascimento Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte
{"title":"European guidelines for the management of tuberculosis screening procedures in migrants: A systematic review.","authors":"Marina Pinheiro, Carolina Valente, Margarida Cruz, David Nascimento Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review assesses the current available evidence across the WHO European region on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different approaches used for TB screening and also explores the facilitators and barriers that migrants face during screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an extensive, comprehensive, and systematic literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge, without any restrictions on publication date or language. In addition, we reviewed grey literature and reports. The data were meticulously analysed with a focus on screening of TB active disease and infection effectiveness indicators, and cost-effectiveness economic analyses as a primary objective and the comprehension of barriers and facilitators of screening as a secondary objective.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our review included 43 studies covering over 8 million migrants from 11 countries. The findings demonstrate that while screening uptake was high, coverage varied, and completion rates for preventive treatments were low. Economic analyses supported the high cost-effectiveness of the screening programmes, particularly when integrating both active TB and TBI screening strategies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This review underscores the cost-effectiveness and public health importance of TB screening in migrant populations within Europe. However, the disparities in screening practices highlight the urgent need for standardisation at the European level.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"31 1","pages":"2482855"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review assesses the current available evidence across the WHO European region on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different approaches used for TB screening and also explores the facilitators and barriers that migrants face during screening programmes.

Methods: We conducted an extensive, comprehensive, and systematic literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge, without any restrictions on publication date or language. In addition, we reviewed grey literature and reports. The data were meticulously analysed with a focus on screening of TB active disease and infection effectiveness indicators, and cost-effectiveness economic analyses as a primary objective and the comprehension of barriers and facilitators of screening as a secondary objective.

Findings: Our review included 43 studies covering over 8 million migrants from 11 countries. The findings demonstrate that while screening uptake was high, coverage varied, and completion rates for preventive treatments were low. Economic analyses supported the high cost-effectiveness of the screening programmes, particularly when integrating both active TB and TBI screening strategies.

Interpretation: This review underscores the cost-effectiveness and public health importance of TB screening in migrant populations within Europe. However, the disparities in screening practices highlight the urgent need for standardisation at the European level.

欧洲移民结核病筛查程序管理指南:系统回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信