Cephalometric Assessment of Sella Turcica Morphology and Dimensions in Patients with Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Hamza Parvez Siddiqui, Karthik Sennimalai, Madhanraj Selvaraj, Vilas D Samrit, Abhijeet Jaiswal
{"title":"Cephalometric Assessment of Sella Turcica Morphology and Dimensions in Patients with Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hamza Parvez Siddiqui, Karthik Sennimalai, Madhanraj Selvaraj, Vilas D Samrit, Abhijeet Jaiswal","doi":"10.1177/10556656251327024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis review aimed to analyze the size and morphology of the Sella Turcica (ST) in 2-dimensional cephalometric radiographs of individuals with non-syndromic cleft lip and or palate (CLP/CP) compared with non-cleft individuals.MethodsA comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was conducted without language and date restrictions until October 12, 2024. Studies were included that assessed ST dimensions in lateral cephalograms and compared the patients with non-syndromic CLP or CP and non-cleft individuals. The studies' quality assessment was assessed using the JBI case-control guidelines and the Anatomical Quality Assurance checklist. Quantitative analysis was performed using the random-effects meta-analysis model. The GRADE approach was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence.ResultsOut of 1087 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria, and 6 were included in the quantitative analysis. Of all, 7 studies were rated moderate, 2 low, and 1 high quality. Unilateral CLP (UCLP) cohort showed statistically significant smaller dimensions for length (MD = -1.22; 95% CI: -2.21, -0.24), depth (MD = -0.65; 95% CI: -1.41, -0.11), and area (MD = -4.75; 95% CI: -7.22, -2.28) and the odds of ST bridging were more than twice compared to non-cleft control. No significant differences were observed in ST dimensions in bilateral CLP versus non-Cleft and UCLP.ConclusionThe evidence of differences in ST dimensions between non-cleft individuals and patients with UCLP is weak, owing to a greater risk of bias resulting from inadequate reporting of design variability, participant demographics, and measurement methods. Future studies with better methodology and larger sample sizes are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251327024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251327024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis review aimed to analyze the size and morphology of the Sella Turcica (ST) in 2-dimensional cephalometric radiographs of individuals with non-syndromic cleft lip and or palate (CLP/CP) compared with non-cleft individuals.MethodsA comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was conducted without language and date restrictions until October 12, 2024. Studies were included that assessed ST dimensions in lateral cephalograms and compared the patients with non-syndromic CLP or CP and non-cleft individuals. The studies' quality assessment was assessed using the JBI case-control guidelines and the Anatomical Quality Assurance checklist. Quantitative analysis was performed using the random-effects meta-analysis model. The GRADE approach was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence.ResultsOut of 1087 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria, and 6 were included in the quantitative analysis. Of all, 7 studies were rated moderate, 2 low, and 1 high quality. Unilateral CLP (UCLP) cohort showed statistically significant smaller dimensions for length (MD = -1.22; 95% CI: -2.21, -0.24), depth (MD = -0.65; 95% CI: -1.41, -0.11), and area (MD = -4.75; 95% CI: -7.22, -2.28) and the odds of ST bridging were more than twice compared to non-cleft control. No significant differences were observed in ST dimensions in bilateral CLP versus non-Cleft and UCLP.ConclusionThe evidence of differences in ST dimensions between non-cleft individuals and patients with UCLP is weak, owing to a greater risk of bias resulting from inadequate reporting of design variability, participant demographics, and measurement methods. Future studies with better methodology and larger sample sizes are needed.

对非综合征唇腭裂患者蝶鞍形态和尺寸的头颅测量评估:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的分析非综合征性唇腭裂(CLP/CP)患者与非唇腭裂患者二维头颅x线片上蝶鞍(ST)的大小和形态。方法对多个电子数据库进行全面检索,无语言和日期限制,检索截止日期为2024年10月12日。研究包括评估侧位脑片的ST尺寸,并比较非综合征性CLP或CP患者和非唇裂个体。研究的质量评估采用JBI病例对照指南和解剖质量保证检查表进行评估。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型进行定量分析。采用GRADE方法评价证据的确定性。结果1087项研究中,10项符合纳入标准,6项纳入定量分析。总共有7项研究被评为中等质量,2项为低质量,1项为高质量。单侧CLP (UCLP)队列显示具有统计学意义的较小尺寸长度(MD = -1.22;95% CI: -2.21, -0.24),深度(MD = -0.65;95% CI: -1.41, -0.11),面积(MD = -4.75;95% CI: -7.22, -2.28), ST桥的几率是非裂对照组的两倍以上。双侧CLP与非裂裂和UCLP的ST尺寸无显著差异。结论:由于设计变异性、参与者人口统计和测量方法的报告不足,导致更大的偏倚风险,非唇裂个体和UCLP患者之间ST维度差异的证据不足。未来的研究需要更好的方法和更大的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信