Adequacy of clinical communication and satisfaction between physicians and family members of patients during COVID-19.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
S A Azer, M M AlHakeem, F M Almutairi, A A Alenazi, R S Manhi, L Y Almeshari
{"title":"Adequacy of clinical communication and satisfaction between physicians and family members of patients during COVID-19.","authors":"S A Azer, M M AlHakeem, F M Almutairi, A A Alenazi, R S Manhi, L Y Almeshari","doi":"10.26355/eurrev_202503_37126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, communication between patients and their treatment teams was severely limited due to restriction laws, which had a devastating impact on both patients and their families. This study examined the adequacy of clinical communication and sufficiency between the treating physicians and relatives of patients with COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive, retrospective study using a validated questionnaire. The study targeted the relatives of patients admitted to King Saud University Medical City (KSUMS) in Riyadh from March 2020 to May 2022. The contact information of the patients' relatives was retrieved from the hospital's electronic admission system (e-SEHAI). A phone questionnaire was completed after contacting identified family members or relatives. RESULTS: The total number of completed questionnaire responses was 404. Of these, 216 (54%) of participants were males, and the remaining 46% were females. Participants comprised parents (41.3%), partners (17.4%), siblings (10%) and other relatives (31.2%). Forty-four percent of participants were satisfied with the quality of communication of the treating team, while 113 (28%) were not satisfied, and 113 (28%) preferred not to express their views. Sixty-nine percent of participants considered consultants the best way to communicate with relatives, while only 17% chose residents. One hundred and forty-seven (36%) of the participants believed that too much communication would not interfere with the clinical work of the physicians, while only 18% agreed it would, and 45% were undecided. CONCLUSIONS: While the authors found a moderate level of participants' satisfaction regarding physician communication during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study identified gaps and areas for potential improvement. The findings could guide more effective hospital communication strategies in the future and better approaches for patient care and family satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong>https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Graphic-Abstract.jpg.</p>","PeriodicalId":12152,"journal":{"name":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","volume":"29 3","pages":"135-148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202503_37126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, communication between patients and their treatment teams was severely limited due to restriction laws, which had a devastating impact on both patients and their families. This study examined the adequacy of clinical communication and sufficiency between the treating physicians and relatives of patients with COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive, retrospective study using a validated questionnaire. The study targeted the relatives of patients admitted to King Saud University Medical City (KSUMS) in Riyadh from March 2020 to May 2022. The contact information of the patients' relatives was retrieved from the hospital's electronic admission system (e-SEHAI). A phone questionnaire was completed after contacting identified family members or relatives. RESULTS: The total number of completed questionnaire responses was 404. Of these, 216 (54%) of participants were males, and the remaining 46% were females. Participants comprised parents (41.3%), partners (17.4%), siblings (10%) and other relatives (31.2%). Forty-four percent of participants were satisfied with the quality of communication of the treating team, while 113 (28%) were not satisfied, and 113 (28%) preferred not to express their views. Sixty-nine percent of participants considered consultants the best way to communicate with relatives, while only 17% chose residents. One hundred and forty-seven (36%) of the participants believed that too much communication would not interfere with the clinical work of the physicians, while only 18% agreed it would, and 45% were undecided. CONCLUSIONS: While the authors found a moderate level of participants' satisfaction regarding physician communication during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study identified gaps and areas for potential improvement. The findings could guide more effective hospital communication strategies in the future and better approaches for patient care and family satisfaction.

Graphical abstract: https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Graphic-Abstract.jpg.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
906
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, a fortnightly journal, acts as an information exchange tool on several aspects of medical and pharmacological sciences. It publishes reviews, original articles, and results from original research. The purposes of the Journal are to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and to contribute to the advancement of medicine. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences includes: -Editorials- Reviews- Original articles- Trials- Brief communications- Case reports (only if of particular interest and accompanied by a short review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信