The Choice Between Pearson's χ2 Test and Fisher's Exact Test for 2 × 2 Tables.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Markus Neuhäuser, Graeme D Ruxton
{"title":"The Choice Between Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> Test and Fisher's Exact Test for 2 × 2 Tables.","authors":"Markus Neuhäuser, Graeme D Ruxton","doi":"10.1002/pst.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pearson's asymptotic χ<sup>2</sup> test is often used to compare binary data between two groups. However, when the sample sizes or expected frequencies are small, the test is usually replaced by Fisher's exact test. Several alternative rules of thumb exist for defining \"small\" in this context. Replacing one test with another based on the obtained data is unusual in statistical practice. Moreover, this commonly-used switch is unnecessary because Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test can easily be carried out as an exact test for any sample sizes. Therefore, we recommend routinely using an exact test regardless of the obtained data. This change of approach allows prespecifying a particular test and a much less ambiguous and more reliable analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 3","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pearson's asymptotic χ2 test is often used to compare binary data between two groups. However, when the sample sizes or expected frequencies are small, the test is usually replaced by Fisher's exact test. Several alternative rules of thumb exist for defining "small" in this context. Replacing one test with another based on the obtained data is unusual in statistical practice. Moreover, this commonly-used switch is unnecessary because Pearson's χ2 test can easily be carried out as an exact test for any sample sizes. Therefore, we recommend routinely using an exact test regardless of the obtained data. This change of approach allows prespecifying a particular test and a much less ambiguous and more reliable analysis.

2 × 2 表的皮尔逊 χ2 检验和费雪精确检验之间的选择。
皮尔逊渐近χ2检验常用于两组间二值数据的比较。但是,当样本量或期望频率很小时,通常用Fisher精确检验代替该检验。在这种情况下,有几个可供选择的经验法则可以用来定义“小”。在统计实践中,根据获得的数据用另一个测试代替一个测试是不寻常的。此外,这种常用的转换是不必要的,因为皮尔逊的χ2检验可以很容易地作为任何样本量的精确检验进行。因此,无论获得的数据如何,我们建议常规使用精确的测试。这种方法的改变允许预先指定特定的测试和更少的模糊和更可靠的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信