Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.02.004

Telman Seisembekov , Nurlan Brimkulov , Ainura Taalaikanova , Galiya Smailova , Aidos Bolatov

{"title":"Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan","authors":"Telman Seisembekov , Nurlan Brimkulov , Ainura Taalaikanova , Galiya Smailova , Aidos Bolatov","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to validate the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (R-CBI) among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and explored factors contributing to burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The original Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was translated into the R-CBI using a rigorous forward-backward method and reviewed by experts. Between July and November 2022, 1,530 nurses were recruited through convenience sampling method from various nursing settings in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to test the scale’s reliability and validity, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. A linear regression analysis was conducted to identify influencing factors of burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The content of the R-CBI is consistent with the original CBI, consisting of 19 items with three dimensions. The Cronbach’s <em>α</em> coefficient is 0.926 in Kazakhstan and 0.922 in Kyrgyzstan, ranging from 0.830 to 0.898 for three dimensions. The CFA results among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan supported the three-factor structure of R-CBI with good fit indices. Concurrent validity was established through significant correlations (<em>P</em> < 0.001) with job satisfaction questionnaire (<em>r</em> = −0.457), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (<em>r</em> = 0.506 in depression, <em>r</em> = 0.485 in anxiety, <em>r</em> = 0.564 in stress), and WHO-5 Well-Being Index (<em>r</em> = −0.528). The overall burnout level was 36.1 ± 17.6 and 37.5 ± 17.4 in Kazakhstani and Kyrgyzstani nurses, respectively. Significant influencing factors of burnout included gender, age, educational level, and COVID-19 infection history.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The R-CBI was proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses’ burnout in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 176-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201322500016X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to validate the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (R-CBI) among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and explored factors contributing to burnout.

Methods

The original Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was translated into the R-CBI using a rigorous forward-backward method and reviewed by experts. Between July and November 2022, 1,530 nurses were recruited through convenience sampling method from various nursing settings in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to test the scale’s reliability and validity, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. A linear regression analysis was conducted to identify influencing factors of burnout.

Results

The content of the R-CBI is consistent with the original CBI, consisting of 19 items with three dimensions. The Cronbach’s α coefficient is 0.926 in Kazakhstan and 0.922 in Kyrgyzstan, ranging from 0.830 to 0.898 for three dimensions. The CFA results among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan supported the three-factor structure of R-CBI with good fit indices. Concurrent validity was established through significant correlations (P < 0.001) with job satisfaction questionnaire (r = −0.457), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (r = 0.506 in depression, r = 0.485 in anxiety, r = 0.564 in stress), and WHO-5 Well-Being Index (r = −0.528). The overall burnout level was 36.1 ± 17.6 and 37.5 ± 17.4 in Kazakhstani and Kyrgyzstani nurses, respectively. Significant influencing factors of burnout included gender, age, educational level, and COVID-19 infection history.

Conclusions

The R-CBI was proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses’ burnout in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.

查看原文本刊更多论文

俄语版哥本哈根职业倦怠量表在哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦护士中的有效性验证

目的本研究旨在对哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦的护士进行俄语版哥本哈根职业倦怠量表（R-CBI）的验证，并探讨影响护士职业倦怠的因素。方法采用严格的前向后法将哥本哈根倦怠量表（CBI）转换为R-CBI量表，并经专家审核。于2022年7月至11月，采用方便抽样的方法，从哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦的不同护理环境中招募了1530名护士，对量表进行了信度和效度测试，包括验证性因子分析（CFA）、内部一致性信度和并发效度。对倦怠的影响因素进行线性回归分析。结果R-CBI的内容与原CBI一致，由19个项目组成，具有三维结构。哈萨克斯坦的Cronbach’s α系数为0.926，吉尔吉斯斯坦的Cronbach’s α系数为0.922，三维范围为0.830 ~ 0.898。哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦护士的CFA结果支持R-CBI的三因素结构，拟合指数较好。并发效度通过显著相关建立(P <；0.001)，包括工作满意度问卷（r =−0.457）、抑郁焦虑压力量表（r = 0.506，焦虑r = 0.485，压力r = 0.564）和WHO-5幸福感指数（r =−0.528）。哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦护士的总体倦怠水平分别为36.1±17.6和37.5±17.4。职业倦怠的显著影响因素包括性别、年龄、文化程度和COVID-19感染史。结论R-CBI是一种可靠、有效的评估哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦护士职业倦怠的工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Sciences Nursing-Nursing (all)

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

2.60%

发文量

408

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.