Segregate Assessment of Data Validity from the More Complex Issue of Fraud.

IF 1.6 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1017/jme.2025.42

Garret A FitzGerald

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust in the validity of published work is of fundamental importance to scientists. Confirmation of validity is more readily attained than addressing the question of whether fraud was involved. Suggestions are made for key stakeholders - institutions and companies, journals, and funders as to how they might enhance trust in science, both by accelerating the assessment of data validity and by segregating that effort from investigation of allegations of fraud.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将数据有效性评估从更复杂的欺诈问题中分离出来。

对科学家来说，信任已发表论文的有效性是至关重要的。确认有效性比解决是否涉及欺诈的问题更容易实现。报告为关键的利益相关者——机构、公司、期刊和资助者——提出了建议，告诉他们如何通过加快对数据有效性的评估，以及将评估工作与对欺诈指控的调查分开，来增强对科学的信任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学：法

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.