Magnetically controlled rod fracture is related to rod diameter but lower than TGR.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Spine deformity Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s43390-025-01067-2

Matthew Weintraub, Omar Taha, Ritt Givens, Matan Malka, Mehdi M Elfilali, Kevin Lu, Paul Sponseller, Peter Sturm, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, John Emans, Francisco Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Michael G Vitale, Benjamin D Roye

{"title":"Magnetically controlled rod fracture is related to rod diameter but lower than TGR.","authors":"Matthew Weintraub, Omar Taha, Ritt Givens, Matan Malka, Mehdi M Elfilali, Kevin Lu, Paul Sponseller, Peter Sturm, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, John Emans, Francisco Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, Michael G Vitale, Benjamin D Roye","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01067-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To quantify the risk of rod fracture after growth-friendly early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgery, compare the risk of fracture between magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and traditional growing rods (TGR), and compare the risk of fracture based on rod diameter.Methods: EOS patients undergoing TGR or MCGR instrumentation were identified from a large, multi-national registry (Pediatric Spine Study Group). Subgroup analyses (chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests) were performed between rods with diameters ≤ 5 mm and > 5 mm and between MCGR and TGR. To account for difference in follow-up, a log-rank survival analysis was performed between subgroups over a 5-year period.Results: A total of 1588 patients, representing 3176 rods, met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in pre-operative Cobb angle or maximum kyphosis between MCGR and TGR groups. At index surgery, MCGR patients were slightly older, taller, and heavier, although BMI was similar. The overall 2-year risk of rod fracture was 3.05%. TGR 2-year fracture risk was higher than MCGR (4.96% vs. 1.82%, p < 0.001). Similarly, among MCGRs, rods with a diameter ≤ 5 mm fractured at a higher rate than those > 5 mm. The 5-year survival analysis corroborated our 2-year findings.Conclusion: Although relatively rare, the risk of rod fracture in EOS patients may be higher than previously reported. The overall risk of rod fracture is higher with TGR compared to MCGR, and while smaller rod diameter led to increased risk of fracture in MCGR constructs, the rod diameter was not associated with fracture risk in TGR.Level of evidence: IV.","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01067-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the risk of rod fracture after growth-friendly early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgery, compare the risk of fracture between magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and traditional growing rods (TGR), and compare the risk of fracture based on rod diameter.

Methods: EOS patients undergoing TGR or MCGR instrumentation were identified from a large, multi-national registry (Pediatric Spine Study Group). Subgroup analyses (chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests) were performed between rods with diameters ≤ 5 mm and > 5 mm and between MCGR and TGR. To account for difference in follow-up, a log-rank survival analysis was performed between subgroups over a 5-year period.

Results: A total of 1588 patients, representing 3176 rods, met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in pre-operative Cobb angle or maximum kyphosis between MCGR and TGR groups. At index surgery, MCGR patients were slightly older, taller, and heavier, although BMI was similar. The overall 2-year risk of rod fracture was 3.05%. TGR 2-year fracture risk was higher than MCGR (4.96% vs. 1.82%, p < 0.001). Similarly, among MCGRs, rods with a diameter ≤ 5 mm fractured at a higher rate than those > 5 mm. The 5-year survival analysis corroborated our 2-year findings.

Conclusion: Although relatively rare, the risk of rod fracture in EOS patients may be higher than previously reported. The overall risk of rod fracture is higher with TGR compared to MCGR, and while smaller rod diameter led to increased risk of fracture in MCGR constructs, the rod diameter was not associated with fracture risk in TGR.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Spine deformity

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

18.80%

发文量

167

期刊介绍： Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.