Very Early Use of Esmolol in Hyperkinetic Septic Shock Patients with Persistent Tachycardia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002576
Sen Lu, Eduardo Kattan, Chun Pan, Jun Shen, Tao Zhang, Ping Wang, Yue Chen, Hong-Li He, Glenn Hernández, Xiao-Bo Huang, Jing-Chao Luo
{"title":"Very Early Use of Esmolol in Hyperkinetic Septic Shock Patients with Persistent Tachycardia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Sen Lu, Eduardo Kattan, Chun Pan, Jun Shen, Tao Zhang, Ping Wang, Yue Chen, Hong-Li He, Glenn Hernández, Xiao-Bo Huang, Jing-Chao Luo","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although β-blockade for heart rate (HR) control in septic shock is conventionally initiated after 24 hours of stabilization in most studies, we investigated whether esmolol could be safely and effectively administered immediately post-initial resuscitation in hyperkinetic septic shock patients with persistent tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled pilot study, 24 hyperkinetic septic shock patients with sinus tachycardia (>95 bpm) after initial resuscitation were randomized to receive either esmolol (titrated for 10% HR reduction) as the treatment group or equal volume of normal saline as the control group. The primary endpoint was achievement of target heart rate reduction, with safety assessed through monitoring of tissue perfusion parameters and hemodynamic stability over 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The esmolol group achieved faster heart rate reduction (12/12 vs. 7/12 patients at 24 h, p = 0.037) with comparable hemodynamic stability. Despite initial decreases in cardiac index (4.5 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.6 L/min/m2, p = 0.009) and oxygen delivery index (585 ± 145 to 504 ± 132 ml, p = 0.040) at 1 hour, tissue perfusion parameters remained stable. No significant between-group differences were observed in central venous oxygen saturation, CO2 gap, microcirculation parameters, inflammatory markers, organ functions, or hospital mortality (42% vs. 42%, p = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggested that post-initial resuscitation early esmolol administration targeting modest HR reduction appears feasible and safe in hyperkinetic septic shock patients with persistent tachycardia, providing foundation for future large-scale investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although β-blockade for heart rate (HR) control in septic shock is conventionally initiated after 24 hours of stabilization in most studies, we investigated whether esmolol could be safely and effectively administered immediately post-initial resuscitation in hyperkinetic septic shock patients with persistent tachycardia.

Methods: In this randomized controlled pilot study, 24 hyperkinetic septic shock patients with sinus tachycardia (>95 bpm) after initial resuscitation were randomized to receive either esmolol (titrated for 10% HR reduction) as the treatment group or equal volume of normal saline as the control group. The primary endpoint was achievement of target heart rate reduction, with safety assessed through monitoring of tissue perfusion parameters and hemodynamic stability over 72 hours.

Results: Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The esmolol group achieved faster heart rate reduction (12/12 vs. 7/12 patients at 24 h, p = 0.037) with comparable hemodynamic stability. Despite initial decreases in cardiac index (4.5 ± 0.9 to 3.9 ± 0.6 L/min/m2, p = 0.009) and oxygen delivery index (585 ± 145 to 504 ± 132 ml, p = 0.040) at 1 hour, tissue perfusion parameters remained stable. No significant between-group differences were observed in central venous oxygen saturation, CO2 gap, microcirculation parameters, inflammatory markers, organ functions, or hospital mortality (42% vs. 42%, p = 1.000).

Conclusion: This pilot study suggested that post-initial resuscitation early esmolol administration targeting modest HR reduction appears feasible and safe in hyperkinetic septic shock patients with persistent tachycardia, providing foundation for future large-scale investigations.

背景:尽管在大多数研究中,脓毒性休克患者控制心率(HR)的β受体阻滞剂通常在病情稳定24小时后开始使用,但我们还是对具有持续性心动过速的高动能脓毒性休克患者首次复苏后是否可以立即安全有效地使用艾司洛尔进行了研究:在这项随机对照试验研究中,24 名在首次复苏后出现窦性心动过速(>95 bpm)的高动能脓毒性休克患者被随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组接受艾司洛尔(滴定为心率降低 10%),对照组接受等量的生理盐水。主要终点是达到降低心率的目标,安全性则通过监测组织灌注参数和72小时内的血液动力学稳定性来评估:结果:两组的人口统计学特征和基线特征相当。艾司洛尔组的心率降低速度更快(24 小时时,12/12 患者对 7/12 患者,p = 0.037),血液动力学稳定性相当。尽管心脏指数(4.5 ± 0.9 至 3.9 ± 0.6 L/min/m2,p = 0.009)和氧输送指数(585 ± 145 至 504 ± 132 ml,p = 0.040)在 1 小时后开始下降,但组织灌注参数保持稳定。在中心静脉血氧饱和度、二氧化碳间隙、微循环参数、炎症标志物、器官功能或住院死亡率(42% 对 42%,p = 1.000)方面未观察到明显的组间差异:这项试验性研究表明,对于持续心动过速的高运动性脓毒性休克患者,复苏后早期使用艾司洛尔以适度降低心率是可行且安全的,这为今后的大规模研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信