Do CAD-CAM fibre posts exhibit higher bond strength and fracture resistance than other types of posts? systematic review with network meta-analysis of in-vitro studies.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammed Maher Ghanem, Xin Yi Leong, Sajesh K Veettil, Anas Al Jada, Musab Saeed, Rohit Kunnath Menon
{"title":"Do CAD-CAM fibre posts exhibit higher bond strength and fracture resistance than other types of posts? systematic review with network meta-analysis of in-vitro studies.","authors":"Mohammed Maher Ghanem, Xin Yi Leong, Sajesh K Veettil, Anas Al Jada, Musab Saeed, Rohit Kunnath Menon","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00315-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-fabricated fibre posts facilitate post-endodontic restoration of endodontically treated teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure. Recent advancements in digital dentistry have led to the introduction of custom-made fibre posts fabricated with computer-aided design-computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) technology. However, evidence on the comparative performance of the different post-types is lacking. This systematic review with network meta-analysis aimed to analyse the current evidence on in-vitro studies comparing bond strength, catastrophic failures, fracture resistance, and cement film thickness between CAD-CAM fibre posts and other post types, including pre-fabricated fibre and custom-made cast-metal posts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies for in-vitro studies from inception until December 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42024501614). Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The ranking was performed using the surface area under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred forty-one articles were identified, of which 80 duplicates were removed, and 585 were excluded by screening the titles and abstracts. A total of 76 articles were assessed by full-text reading, and 16 were included in the quantitative synthesis. CAD-CAM fibre posts (SMD = 1.09 [95% CI: 0.01, 2.17]) P = 0.04 demonstrated higher bond strength when compared to pre-fabricated posts. CAD-CAM fibre posts (RR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.69]) P < 0.05 demonstrated a lower risk for catastrophic failures when compared to pre-fabricated fibre posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-vitro studies demonstrated that CAD-CAM fibre posts demonstrated higher bond strength, lower catastrophic failure rates, and similar fracture resistance compared to pre-fabricated and cast metal posts. The data on bond strength and catastrophic failures of CAD-CAM fibre posts must be validated clinically by high-quality, randomised, controlled clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00315-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pre-fabricated fibre posts facilitate post-endodontic restoration of endodontically treated teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure. Recent advancements in digital dentistry have led to the introduction of custom-made fibre posts fabricated with computer-aided design-computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) technology. However, evidence on the comparative performance of the different post-types is lacking. This systematic review with network meta-analysis aimed to analyse the current evidence on in-vitro studies comparing bond strength, catastrophic failures, fracture resistance, and cement film thickness between CAD-CAM fibre posts and other post types, including pre-fabricated fibre and custom-made cast-metal posts.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies for in-vitro studies from inception until December 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42024501614). Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The ranking was performed using the surface area under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) guidelines.

Results: Seven hundred forty-one articles were identified, of which 80 duplicates were removed, and 585 were excluded by screening the titles and abstracts. A total of 76 articles were assessed by full-text reading, and 16 were included in the quantitative synthesis. CAD-CAM fibre posts (SMD = 1.09 [95% CI: 0.01, 2.17]) P = 0.04 demonstrated higher bond strength when compared to pre-fabricated posts. CAD-CAM fibre posts (RR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.69]) P < 0.05 demonstrated a lower risk for catastrophic failures when compared to pre-fabricated fibre posts.

Conclusions: In-vitro studies demonstrated that CAD-CAM fibre posts demonstrated higher bond strength, lower catastrophic failure rates, and similar fracture resistance compared to pre-fabricated and cast metal posts. The data on bond strength and catastrophic failures of CAD-CAM fibre posts must be validated clinically by high-quality, randomised, controlled clinical trials.

CAD-CAM 纤维支柱是否比其他类型的支柱具有更高的粘接强度和抗断裂性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信