It is time to reassess reporting of electroconvulsive therapy data in New Zealand: A 17-year retrospective analysis of treatment data from Waikato.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Robert M Lundin, Savani Kannangara, Matthew Jenkins, Teresa Carroll, Kathrine Wakefield, Colin Patrick, Moloud Abdar, Abbas Khosravi, Colleen Loo, Michael Berk
{"title":"It is time to reassess reporting of electroconvulsive therapy data in New Zealand: A 17-year retrospective analysis of treatment data from Waikato.","authors":"Robert M Lundin, Savani Kannangara, Matthew Jenkins, Teresa Carroll, Kathrine Wakefield, Colin Patrick, Moloud Abdar, Abbas Khosravi, Colleen Loo, Michael Berk","doi":"10.1177/00048674251324795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The New Zealand Government has provided brief annual reports on electroconvulsive therapy treatment since 2004. Despite this, only limited information is made available to clinicians to guide clinical improvement and refine guidelines. Beyond an audit from Otago detailing 10 years of electroconvulsive therapy treatments, limited information is available about electroconvulsive therapy treatments in New Zealand. This paper reports on the use of electroconvulsive therapy over the past 17 years in one New Zealand District Health Board.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It covers 7126 treatments for 333 patients between 2004 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite an increasing number of treatments, there has been no per capita growth when corrected for the population. Despite criticism for the disproportionate use of electroconvulsive therapy in women, treatment equity for men and women has been evidenced over the latter 3 years. The majority of treatments were given under voluntary consent, even among patients admitted under the Mental Health Act. Clinical practice is moving towards bifrontal treatment over other electrode placements in response to clinical guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While COVID-19 had broad impacts across healthcare services, it has not led to an overall change in treatments. There was, however, a noticeable shift towards more psychotic disorders treated during the pandemic. This study also provides data that Māori and Pacific Islanders are accessing electroconvulsive therapy, though rates of electroconvulsive therapy usage are still lesser on a proportional population basis. Conclusions are provided to improve national data collection and reporting standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674251324795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251324795","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The New Zealand Government has provided brief annual reports on electroconvulsive therapy treatment since 2004. Despite this, only limited information is made available to clinicians to guide clinical improvement and refine guidelines. Beyond an audit from Otago detailing 10 years of electroconvulsive therapy treatments, limited information is available about electroconvulsive therapy treatments in New Zealand. This paper reports on the use of electroconvulsive therapy over the past 17 years in one New Zealand District Health Board.

Methods: It covers 7126 treatments for 333 patients between 2004 and 2020.

Results: Despite an increasing number of treatments, there has been no per capita growth when corrected for the population. Despite criticism for the disproportionate use of electroconvulsive therapy in women, treatment equity for men and women has been evidenced over the latter 3 years. The majority of treatments were given under voluntary consent, even among patients admitted under the Mental Health Act. Clinical practice is moving towards bifrontal treatment over other electrode placements in response to clinical guidance.

Conclusion: While COVID-19 had broad impacts across healthcare services, it has not led to an overall change in treatments. There was, however, a noticeable shift towards more psychotic disorders treated during the pandemic. This study also provides data that Māori and Pacific Islanders are accessing electroconvulsive therapy, though rates of electroconvulsive therapy usage are still lesser on a proportional population basis. Conclusions are provided to improve national data collection and reporting standards.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信