Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis using deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hae Young Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Se Jin Choi, Dong Hwan Kim, Subin Heo, Hyeon Ji Jang, Sang Hyun Choi
{"title":"Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis using deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT.","authors":"Hae Young Kim, Kyung Jin Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Se Jin Choi, Dong Hwan Kim, Subin Heo, Hyeon Ji Jang, Sang Hyun Choi","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04872-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS), using histology as reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 3,620 liver donors (2,393 men and 1,227 women; mean age, 31.7 ± 9.4 years), divided into the development (n = 2,714) and test (n = 906) cohorts. Attenuation values of the liver and spleen on CECT were measured both manually and using a deep learning algorithm (before and after radiologists' correction of segmentation errors). Performance of: (1) liver attenuation and (2) liver-spleen attenuation difference for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (> 33%) was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three different criteria targeting 95% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and the maximum Youden's index, respectively, for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS, were developed and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of deep learning-based measurements did not differ significantly, with or without radiologists' corrections (p = 0.13). Liver-spleen attenuation difference outperformed liver attenuation alone in diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS in both deep learning-based (AUC, 0.868 vs. 0.821; p = 0.001) and manual (AUC, 0.871 vs. 0.823; p = 0.001) measurements. In the test cohort, the criterion targeting 95% sensitivity for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ 2.8 HU) yielded 92.0% (69/75) sensitivity and 48.5% (403/831) specificity. The criterion targeting 95% specificity (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ -18.8 HU) yielded 53.3% (40/75) sensitivity and 95.7% (795/831) specificity. The criterion targeting the maximum Youden's index (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ -8.2 HU) yielded 82.7% (62/75) sensitivity and 80.7% (671/831) specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning-based automated measurements of liver and spleen attenuation on CECT can be used reliably to detect moderate-to-severe HS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04872-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS), using histology as reference standard.

Methods: This retrospective study included 3,620 liver donors (2,393 men and 1,227 women; mean age, 31.7 ± 9.4 years), divided into the development (n = 2,714) and test (n = 906) cohorts. Attenuation values of the liver and spleen on CECT were measured both manually and using a deep learning algorithm (before and after radiologists' correction of segmentation errors). Performance of: (1) liver attenuation and (2) liver-spleen attenuation difference for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (> 33%) was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three different criteria targeting 95% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and the maximum Youden's index, respectively, for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS, were developed and validated.

Results: The performance of deep learning-based measurements did not differ significantly, with or without radiologists' corrections (p = 0.13). Liver-spleen attenuation difference outperformed liver attenuation alone in diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS in both deep learning-based (AUC, 0.868 vs. 0.821; p = 0.001) and manual (AUC, 0.871 vs. 0.823; p = 0.001) measurements. In the test cohort, the criterion targeting 95% sensitivity for diagnosing moderate-to-severe HS (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ 2.8 HU) yielded 92.0% (69/75) sensitivity and 48.5% (403/831) specificity. The criterion targeting 95% specificity (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ -18.8 HU) yielded 53.3% (40/75) sensitivity and 95.7% (795/831) specificity. The criterion targeting the maximum Youden's index (liver-spleen attenuation difference ≤ -8.2 HU) yielded 82.7% (62/75) sensitivity and 80.7% (671/831) specificity.

Conclusion: Deep learning-based automated measurements of liver and spleen attenuation on CECT can be used reliably to detect moderate-to-severe HS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信