Productivity of mixed plantations of ash and larch in northeastern China – a model-based analysis

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Lihu Dong , Qing Wang , Xingji Jin , Timo Pukkala , Fengri Li
{"title":"Productivity of mixed plantations of ash and larch in northeastern China – a model-based analysis","authors":"Lihu Dong ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Xingji Jin ,&nbsp;Timo Pukkala ,&nbsp;Fengri Li","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mixed forests are favored in forest management because of their higher biodiversity and resilience than pure stands. The productivity of a mixed stand may be better than the average of monospecific stands of those species that form the mixed stand. In northeastern China, most plantation forests are monocultures, but mixed plantations are also increasingly established. Several experiments of planted mixtures of Changbai larch (<em>Larix olgensis</em>) and Manchurian ash (<em>Fraxinus mandshurica</em>) have been established in the Heilongjiang province of northeastern China. This study analyzed the growth and mortality of the trees in these experiments at ages 15–30 years. Both distance-dependent and distance-independent tree-level models for diameter increment and mortality were developed. The analyses showed that competition indices calculated from tree heights performed better than indices based on trunk diameters, indicating the importance of competition for light. The models suggested that ash benefits from a larch admixture, but larch does not benefit from the presence of ashes. Simulations conducted using the models showed that, at stand ages of 15–30 years, ash stands were more productive than mixed or pure larch stands. Because the two species performed differently in different experiments and plots, no overall conclusions could be drawn about the overyielding or under-yielding of mixed stands. In some sites, the mixture may be more productive than the average of pure stands, but this conclusion cannot be generalized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"585 ","pages":"Article 122609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725001173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed forests are favored in forest management because of their higher biodiversity and resilience than pure stands. The productivity of a mixed stand may be better than the average of monospecific stands of those species that form the mixed stand. In northeastern China, most plantation forests are monocultures, but mixed plantations are also increasingly established. Several experiments of planted mixtures of Changbai larch (Larix olgensis) and Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) have been established in the Heilongjiang province of northeastern China. This study analyzed the growth and mortality of the trees in these experiments at ages 15–30 years. Both distance-dependent and distance-independent tree-level models for diameter increment and mortality were developed. The analyses showed that competition indices calculated from tree heights performed better than indices based on trunk diameters, indicating the importance of competition for light. The models suggested that ash benefits from a larch admixture, but larch does not benefit from the presence of ashes. Simulations conducted using the models showed that, at stand ages of 15–30 years, ash stands were more productive than mixed or pure larch stands. Because the two species performed differently in different experiments and plots, no overall conclusions could be drawn about the overyielding or under-yielding of mixed stands. In some sites, the mixture may be more productive than the average of pure stands, but this conclusion cannot be generalized.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信