Relevance of community perceptions in mapping cultural ecosystem services: Lessons from bio-cultural landscape of Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Rupali Nayal , Manu Thomas , Anuj Kumar Tripathi , Kusum Jaswal , Rajarshi Dasgupta , Shizuka Hashimoto , Shalini Dhyani
{"title":"Relevance of community perceptions in mapping cultural ecosystem services: Lessons from bio-cultural landscape of Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha","authors":"Rupali Nayal ,&nbsp;Manu Thomas ,&nbsp;Anuj Kumar Tripathi ,&nbsp;Kusum Jaswal ,&nbsp;Rajarshi Dasgupta ,&nbsp;Shizuka Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Shalini Dhyani","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The narrative surrounding coastal and marine conservation has largely focused on ecosystem services, viewing nature as a provider of benefits, to shape management practices worldwide. However, there has been a lack of emphasis on the bidirectional relationship between coastal communities and these ecosystems. This includes the Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) or non-material values they encompass, namely how local populations interact with, perceive, and sustain these coastal seascapes. The present study aimed to explore and understand the relevance of community perceptions for CES within Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary (BKWS) in Odisha. Employing a Public-Participatory Geographical Information System (PPGIS) approach, we engaged 119 local stakeholders to identify and evaluate non-material values associated with the landscape. The survey encompassed socio-demographic information, ecosystem services derived from different production landscapes, awareness about the landscape changes, and valuation of CES, including cultural disservices. The residents identified 59 locations depicting 6 landscape values. Using interpolation techniques, six maps were computed to spatially characterize the diverse CES perceived by coastal communities. Results highlighted the importance of non-material benefits, with religious and aesthetic values being particularly significant. Regression analysis indicated that factors such as age, gender, etc. significantly influenced the appreciation of non-material values. Hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi∗) identified areas of concentrated CES across varied production landscapes. By aligning community priorities with ecological objectives, the study provides a model with replication potential for sustainable mangrove management that can contribute to coastal conservation and mangrove restoration goals by promoting the synergy of ecological resilience and cultural preservation in coastal governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 107626"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The narrative surrounding coastal and marine conservation has largely focused on ecosystem services, viewing nature as a provider of benefits, to shape management practices worldwide. However, there has been a lack of emphasis on the bidirectional relationship between coastal communities and these ecosystems. This includes the Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) or non-material values they encompass, namely how local populations interact with, perceive, and sustain these coastal seascapes. The present study aimed to explore and understand the relevance of community perceptions for CES within Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary (BKWS) in Odisha. Employing a Public-Participatory Geographical Information System (PPGIS) approach, we engaged 119 local stakeholders to identify and evaluate non-material values associated with the landscape. The survey encompassed socio-demographic information, ecosystem services derived from different production landscapes, awareness about the landscape changes, and valuation of CES, including cultural disservices. The residents identified 59 locations depicting 6 landscape values. Using interpolation techniques, six maps were computed to spatially characterize the diverse CES perceived by coastal communities. Results highlighted the importance of non-material benefits, with religious and aesthetic values being particularly significant. Regression analysis indicated that factors such as age, gender, etc. significantly influenced the appreciation of non-material values. Hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi∗) identified areas of concentrated CES across varied production landscapes. By aligning community priorities with ecological objectives, the study provides a model with replication potential for sustainable mangrove management that can contribute to coastal conservation and mangrove restoration goals by promoting the synergy of ecological resilience and cultural preservation in coastal governance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信