Differential sleep architecture in different subtypes of positional obstructive sleep apnea in children

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
ChenXi Luo, Qi Li, WenBo Chen
{"title":"Differential sleep architecture in different subtypes of positional obstructive sleep apnea in children","authors":"ChenXi Luo,&nbsp;Qi Li,&nbsp;WenBo Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of two types of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in children: supine dominant OSA (spOSA) and supine isolated OSA (siOSA). The goal was to investigate the differences in sleep structures between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 384 children with OSA were included. Children with POSA were categorized into two subgroups: siOSA for those with a non-supine AHI &lt;1, and spOSA for those with a non-supine AHI ≥1. Clinical characteristics and polysomnographic features were compared between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 384 patients with OSA, 128 (33.3 %) were classified as POSA. Weight, BMI, and BMI Z-scores were higher in the POSA group compared to the non-POSA group (NPOSA). Polysomnography (PSG) data indicated that total sleep time (TST) and N2 % were higher in the POSA group than in the NPOSA group. Minimum SaO<sub>2</sub> was lower in the POSA group, and oxygen desaturation index(ODI)values were higher compared to the NPOSA group. The rate of overweight and obesity was higher in the POSA group. Among the 128 POSA cases, 47 (36.7 %) were classified as spOSA and 81 (63.3 %) as siOSA. The siOSA patients were younger than those in the spOSA group. SiOSA patients had a higher N2 %, lower R %, and lower AHI, AHI<sub>NREM</sub>, AHI<sub>REM</sub>, OAHI, HI, and ODI compared to spOSA patients. The spOSA group had a higher rate of severe OSA compared to the siOSA group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found significant differences between children with spOSA and siOSA. The spOSA group had higher values in AHI-related parameters. The spOSA group also showed a higher rate of moderate-to-severe OSA. In contrast, the siOSA group had younger age. Additionally, the siOSA group displayed abnormal sleep architecture: higher N2 % and lower R %. These differences suggest distinct pathological mechanisms may exist between the two subtypes. Therefore, targeted clinical strategies should be developed for each subtype.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625000990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of two types of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in children: supine dominant OSA (spOSA) and supine isolated OSA (siOSA). The goal was to investigate the differences in sleep structures between the two groups.

Methods

A total of 384 children with OSA were included. Children with POSA were categorized into two subgroups: siOSA for those with a non-supine AHI <1, and spOSA for those with a non-supine AHI ≥1. Clinical characteristics and polysomnographic features were compared between the two groups.

Results

Among the 384 patients with OSA, 128 (33.3 %) were classified as POSA. Weight, BMI, and BMI Z-scores were higher in the POSA group compared to the non-POSA group (NPOSA). Polysomnography (PSG) data indicated that total sleep time (TST) and N2 % were higher in the POSA group than in the NPOSA group. Minimum SaO2 was lower in the POSA group, and oxygen desaturation index(ODI)values were higher compared to the NPOSA group. The rate of overweight and obesity was higher in the POSA group. Among the 128 POSA cases, 47 (36.7 %) were classified as spOSA and 81 (63.3 %) as siOSA. The siOSA patients were younger than those in the spOSA group. SiOSA patients had a higher N2 %, lower R %, and lower AHI, AHINREM, AHIREM, OAHI, HI, and ODI compared to spOSA patients. The spOSA group had a higher rate of severe OSA compared to the siOSA group.

Conclusion

This study found significant differences between children with spOSA and siOSA. The spOSA group had higher values in AHI-related parameters. The spOSA group also showed a higher rate of moderate-to-severe OSA. In contrast, the siOSA group had younger age. Additionally, the siOSA group displayed abnormal sleep architecture: higher N2 % and lower R %. These differences suggest distinct pathological mechanisms may exist between the two subtypes. Therefore, targeted clinical strategies should be developed for each subtype.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信