Oral fluorescein angiography in pediatric ophthalmology.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ramsey Ghaleb, Ahmed B Sallam, Florin Grigorian, Paul H Phillips, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
{"title":"Oral fluorescein angiography in pediatric ophthalmology.","authors":"Ramsey Ghaleb, Ahmed B Sallam, Florin Grigorian, Paul H Phillips, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluate the administration protocols, diagnostic utility, and safety of oral fluorescein angiography (OFA) in pediatric ophthalmological diseases, with a secondary objective of comparing OFA to intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) in terms of image quality and clinical utility. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies involving pediatric patients. Fifteen studies were included, with 11 assessing the utility and safety of OFA and 4 comparing it to IVFA. These studies covered 581 eyes from 464 patients. The most common dosing protocol for OFA involved 25 mg/kg of 10 % fluorescein dye, with various dilution solutions and fasting requirements enhancing image quality. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild reactions such as itching or nausea observed in 0.019 % of patients. OFA demonstrated good diagnostic value across various pathologies, including retinal vasculopathies, uveitis, disc edema, and Coats disease. OFA is a feasible imaging modality that is a less invasive and better-tolerated alternative to IVFA in the pediatric population, providing high-quality diagnostic images with fewer adverse effects. Our review highlights the need for standardized administration protocols and further research into optimizing dosing and ingestion techniques to enhance image quality and diagnostic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluate the administration protocols, diagnostic utility, and safety of oral fluorescein angiography (OFA) in pediatric ophthalmological diseases, with a secondary objective of comparing OFA to intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) in terms of image quality and clinical utility. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies involving pediatric patients. Fifteen studies were included, with 11 assessing the utility and safety of OFA and 4 comparing it to IVFA. These studies covered 581 eyes from 464 patients. The most common dosing protocol for OFA involved 25 mg/kg of 10 % fluorescein dye, with various dilution solutions and fasting requirements enhancing image quality. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild reactions such as itching or nausea observed in 0.019 % of patients. OFA demonstrated good diagnostic value across various pathologies, including retinal vasculopathies, uveitis, disc edema, and Coats disease. OFA is a feasible imaging modality that is a less invasive and better-tolerated alternative to IVFA in the pediatric population, providing high-quality diagnostic images with fewer adverse effects. Our review highlights the need for standardized administration protocols and further research into optimizing dosing and ingestion techniques to enhance image quality and diagnostic utility.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信