The Los Angeles-B esophagitis is a conclusive diagnostic evidence for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the validation of Lyon Consensus 2.0.

Abstract

Background and aims: Recently, Lyon Consensus 2.0 recommended Los Angeles (LA)-B esophagitis as conclusive evidence and LA-A esophagitis as borderline evidence for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of LA-B and LA-A esophagitis.

Methods: Patients with typical reflux symptoms who underwent endoscopy examination and received acid-suppressive therapy from two tertiary hospitals [the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China) and the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu (Chengdu, P. R. China)] were retrospectively included. Acid-suppression response rates, endoscopy results, motility, and reflux parameters were compared between patients with different grades of esophagitis.

Results: In total, 401 patients were enrolled, among whom 254 were without reflux esophagitis (RE), 51 had LA-A esophagitis, 44 had LA-B esophagitis, and 52 had LA-C/D esophagitis. Patients with LA-B esophagitis and LA-C/D esophagitis had significantly higher acid-suppressive response rates than non-RE patients (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found between patients with LA-A esophagitis and non-RE patients (non-RE vs LA-A vs LA-B vs LA-C/D: 52.4% vs 70.6% vs 75.0% vs 82.7%). Among patients with LA-A esophagitis, those with a number of reflux episodes that exceeded 80 per day (90.0% vs 52.4%, P = 0.044) or hypotensive esophagogastric junction (72.4% vs 52.4%, P = 0.040) had significantly higher acid-suppressive response rates than non-RE patients.

Conclusions: LA-B esophagitis can be regarded as conclusive evidence for GERD and initiate acid-suppressive therapy. LA-A esophagitis did not establish a definite GERD diagnosis alone. When combined with adjunctive or supportive evidence, the acid-suppressive therapy response rate of LA-A esophagitis improved.