Perspective: Closing the Regulatory Gap: Addressing Challenges for Autonomous Agricultural Equipment in California.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Farzaneh Khorsandi, Kent E Pinkerton, Minyoung Hong
{"title":"Perspective: Closing the Regulatory Gap: Addressing Challenges for Autonomous Agricultural Equipment in California.","authors":"Farzaneh Khorsandi, Kent E Pinkerton, Minyoung Hong","doi":"10.13031/jash.16112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Outdated safety regulations pose challenges for autonomous agricultural tractors. Cal/OSHA denied the petition to update regulations for autonomous tractors. The industry's experimental variance shows potential but lacks sufficient data. Recommendations include third-party safety testing and creating an advisory group.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>As of August 2024, California's agricultural tractor safety regulations, developed over half a century ago, are still focused on classic tractors with human operators. These regulations are problematic when applied to autonomous equipment. Since agricultural equipment has advanced, producers have faced challenges in complying with existing regulations for autonomous machinery in California. A petition (No. 596) was submitted in December 2021 to the State of California Department of Industrial Relations and reviewed in March 2023. The petition requesting modification of the agricultural tractor's traditional regulation was recently submitted to the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (OSHSB). The OSHSB denied both petitions. This article discusses more details related to California agricultural tractor safety regulations, the petition to modify the traditional regulations, discussions on OSHSB meetings regarding the petition, and several suggestions to resolve the current issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":"30 4","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.16112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: Outdated safety regulations pose challenges for autonomous agricultural tractors. Cal/OSHA denied the petition to update regulations for autonomous tractors. The industry's experimental variance shows potential but lacks sufficient data. Recommendations include third-party safety testing and creating an advisory group.

Abstract: As of August 2024, California's agricultural tractor safety regulations, developed over half a century ago, are still focused on classic tractors with human operators. These regulations are problematic when applied to autonomous equipment. Since agricultural equipment has advanced, producers have faced challenges in complying with existing regulations for autonomous machinery in California. A petition (No. 596) was submitted in December 2021 to the State of California Department of Industrial Relations and reviewed in March 2023. The petition requesting modification of the agricultural tractor's traditional regulation was recently submitted to the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (OSHSB). The OSHSB denied both petitions. This article discusses more details related to California agricultural tractor safety regulations, the petition to modify the traditional regulations, discussions on OSHSB meetings regarding the petition, and several suggestions to resolve the current issue.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信