Fertility and Sterility top videos from 2022.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Joseph Findley, Zaraq Khan, John Preston Parry, Kira Eickman, Steven R Lindheim
{"title":"Fertility and Sterility top videos from 2022.","authors":"Joseph Findley, Zaraq Khan, John Preston Parry, Kira Eickman, Steven R Lindheim","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To objectively grade all video publications in Fertility & Sterility during the year 2022 and compile a list of the top 10 surgical videos.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive presentation of the 10 highest scoring video publications from Fertility & Sterility in the year 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Not applicable EXPOSURE: JF, ZK, JPP, and SRL acted as independent reviewers of all video publications. A standardized scoring method was used to score all videos.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Up to 5 points were awarded for each of the following categories: Scientific merit or clinical relevance of the topic; clarity of video; use of innovative surgical technique; and video editing or use of marking tools on the video to highlight important features or surgical landmarks. This allowed a maximum score of 20 for each video. The number of YouTube views and likes were used as a tiebreaker if ≥2 videos scored similarly. The interclass coefficient from a 2-way random effects model was calculated to assess for agreement between the 4 independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 32 videos were published in Fertility and Sterility during the year 2022. After averaging scores from all 4 reviewers, a top-10 list was created. The overall interclass correlation coefficient for the 4 reviews was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>An overall substantial agreement was noted between the 4 reviewers. 10 videos stood out from a list of very competitive publications that had already undergone the peer review process. The subject matter of these videos ranged from complex surgical procedures, including uterine transplantation, to common gynecologic ultrasound procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.03.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To objectively grade all video publications in Fertility & Sterility during the year 2022 and compile a list of the top 10 surgical videos.

Design: Descriptive presentation of the 10 highest scoring video publications from Fertility & Sterility in the year 2022.

Subjects: Not applicable EXPOSURE: JF, ZK, JPP, and SRL acted as independent reviewers of all video publications. A standardized scoring method was used to score all videos.

Main outcome measures: Up to 5 points were awarded for each of the following categories: Scientific merit or clinical relevance of the topic; clarity of video; use of innovative surgical technique; and video editing or use of marking tools on the video to highlight important features or surgical landmarks. This allowed a maximum score of 20 for each video. The number of YouTube views and likes were used as a tiebreaker if ≥2 videos scored similarly. The interclass coefficient from a 2-way random effects model was calculated to assess for agreement between the 4 independent reviewers.

Result(s): A total of 32 videos were published in Fertility and Sterility during the year 2022. After averaging scores from all 4 reviewers, a top-10 list was created. The overall interclass correlation coefficient for the 4 reviews was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.85).

Conclusion(s): An overall substantial agreement was noted between the 4 reviewers. 10 videos stood out from a list of very competitive publications that had already undergone the peer review process. The subject matter of these videos ranged from complex surgical procedures, including uterine transplantation, to common gynecologic ultrasound procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信