Comparison of Angle Kappa Measurements: Repeatability of Sirius, Keratron, and Pentacam and Agreement With Amaris 750S.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241230-05
Yuzhou Wang, Xiaojian Hu, Qianwen Gong, Ye Yu, Fan Lu, Liang Hu
{"title":"Comparison of Angle Kappa Measurements: Repeatability of Sirius, Keratron, and Pentacam and Agreement With Amaris 750S.","authors":"Yuzhou Wang, Xiaojian Hu, Qianwen Gong, Ye Yu, Fan Lu, Liang Hu","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241230-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of angle kappa measurements obtained from the Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), Sirius (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici), and Keratron Scout (BVI), and to assess the agreement with those obtained from the Amaris 750S (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 110 patients scheduled to undergo transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy or femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. Before surgery, each patient underwent angle kappa measurement using three instruments: Pentacam, Sirius, and Keratron. Prior to corneal ablation with the excimer laser during surgery, the angle kappa was measured again using an Amaris 750S. Within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability, within-subject coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the repeatability of the angle kappa measurements using the three instruments before surgery. A Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between these three instruments and the Amaris 750S to measure the angle kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the kappa offsets measured by Sirius, Keratron, and Pentacam, the ICC values were 0.948, 0.950, and 0.931, respectively. For the measurement of the kappa axis using the three instruments, the ICC values were 0.996, 0.997, and 0.994, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of kappa offset between Keratron and Amaris 750S was from -0.15 to +0.09 mm, which was the narrowest among the three instruments compared with the Amaris 750S, and the narrowest 95% LoA of kappa axial was also between the Keratron and Amaris 750S.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results measured before Keratron, whether kappa offset or kappa axial, were relatively consistent with those measured intraoperatively using the Amaris 750S. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(2):e213-e219.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 3","pages":"e213-e219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241230-05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of angle kappa measurements obtained from the Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), Sirius (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici), and Keratron Scout (BVI), and to assess the agreement with those obtained from the Amaris 750S (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).

Methods: This study included 110 patients scheduled to undergo transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy or femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. Before surgery, each patient underwent angle kappa measurement using three instruments: Pentacam, Sirius, and Keratron. Prior to corneal ablation with the excimer laser during surgery, the angle kappa was measured again using an Amaris 750S. Within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability, within-subject coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the repeatability of the angle kappa measurements using the three instruments before surgery. A Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between these three instruments and the Amaris 750S to measure the angle kappa.

Results: For the kappa offsets measured by Sirius, Keratron, and Pentacam, the ICC values were 0.948, 0.950, and 0.931, respectively. For the measurement of the kappa axis using the three instruments, the ICC values were 0.996, 0.997, and 0.994, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of kappa offset between Keratron and Amaris 750S was from -0.15 to +0.09 mm, which was the narrowest among the three instruments compared with the Amaris 750S, and the narrowest 95% LoA of kappa axial was also between the Keratron and Amaris 750S.

Conclusions: The results measured before Keratron, whether kappa offset or kappa axial, were relatively consistent with those measured intraoperatively using the Amaris 750S. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(2):e213-e219.].

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信