Embolic Effect of Different Cyanoacrylates: Radiological and Histological Comparison in an In Vivo Rabbit Renal-Artery Model.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pierre-Olivier Comby, Kévin Guillen, Olivier Chevallier, Emilie Couloumy, Anne Dencausse, Philippe Robert, Sarah Catoen, Anne-Virginie Salsac, Serge Ludwig Aho-Glele, Romaric Loffroy
{"title":"Embolic Effect of Different Cyanoacrylates: Radiological and Histological Comparison in an In Vivo Rabbit Renal-Artery Model.","authors":"Pierre-Olivier Comby, Kévin Guillen, Olivier Chevallier, Emilie Couloumy, Anne Dencausse, Philippe Robert, Sarah Catoen, Anne-Virginie Salsac, Serge Ludwig Aho-Glele, Romaric Loffroy","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-03997-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the radiological and histological effects of three different cyanoacrylate glues used for in vivo renal artery embolization in rabbits.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA), NBCA-methacryloxysulfolane (NBCA-MS), and α-hexyl-cyanoacrylate (AHCA) were each used to embolize five renal arteries under free-flow conditions with a 1:3 glue/ethiodized oil ratio. The rabbits were euthanized 30 min after embolization. Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to assess glue cast distribution (extent of penetration into the vascular tree), fragmentation (presence of discontinuities within the cast), and heterogeneity (variability in cast density). Histological slides were analyzed for lumen dilatation, intimal arteritis, necrosis, and peri-arterial edema. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glue penetration into interlobar and corticomedullary arteries was observed consistently in all three groups. Fragmentation scores showed no significant differences between glue types, but AHCA demonstrated significantly lower heterogeneity in proximal arteries compared to NBCA-MS (P = 0.019). Severe lumen dilatation and intimal necrosis were observed in all samples, whereas intimal arteritis was significantly less severe with AHCA compared to NBCA-MS (P < 0.001). No significant differences in peri-arterial edema were found between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Micro-CT features were similar with all three glues. AHCA produced greater cast uniformity and less intimal arteritis, suggesting a role in endovascular embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-03997-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the radiological and histological effects of three different cyanoacrylate glues used for in vivo renal artery embolization in rabbits.

Materials and methods: N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA), NBCA-methacryloxysulfolane (NBCA-MS), and α-hexyl-cyanoacrylate (AHCA) were each used to embolize five renal arteries under free-flow conditions with a 1:3 glue/ethiodized oil ratio. The rabbits were euthanized 30 min after embolization. Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used to assess glue cast distribution (extent of penetration into the vascular tree), fragmentation (presence of discontinuities within the cast), and heterogeneity (variability in cast density). Histological slides were analyzed for lumen dilatation, intimal arteritis, necrosis, and peri-arterial edema. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: Glue penetration into interlobar and corticomedullary arteries was observed consistently in all three groups. Fragmentation scores showed no significant differences between glue types, but AHCA demonstrated significantly lower heterogeneity in proximal arteries compared to NBCA-MS (P = 0.019). Severe lumen dilatation and intimal necrosis were observed in all samples, whereas intimal arteritis was significantly less severe with AHCA compared to NBCA-MS (P < 0.001). No significant differences in peri-arterial edema were found between groups.

Conclusion: Micro-CT features were similar with all three glues. AHCA produced greater cast uniformity and less intimal arteritis, suggesting a role in endovascular embolization.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信